Mecause melting does not destroy the radioactivity. Whatever burns would cause radioactive ash/smoke that would be carried away on the wind. the rest would just turn a patch of the lava radioactive.
no, its not safe to dispose nuclear waste in water,rather it would be safe to dispose it in common salt trenches.
Nuclear wastes are sometimes said to be a problem too difficult to solve because the waste stays radioactive for so long. The only thing that gets rid of nuclear waste is time.
No physical or chemical process can alter the radioactivity of the waste, so it will still be there whatever you do with it. If the volcano is active, when the next lava flow occurs the nuclear waste will be ejected with the volcanic matter, so it would be a very bad idea. The idea for long term waste disposal is to find somewhere very geologically stable where it will stay for thousands of years without any risk of returning to the earth's surface, just the opposite of the volcano's contents.
All countries that have nuclear reactors have nuclear waste and it is always a problem, though a manageable one.
It is the Yucca Mountain Nuclear Waste Repository.
no, its not safe to dispose nuclear waste in water,rather it would be safe to dispose it in common salt trenches.
its expensive to dispose of the waste and the initial machinery is expensive to build.
Merits: it is efficient does not produce green house gases Demerits: it produces nuclear waste that can get people badly sick and eventualy kill them if exsposed to it and the waste is realy hard to "dispose" of
They are not good because of the pollution rate and the fact that the waste production is very hard to dispose of
Depending on where it is stored it could cause major pollution problems or even deaths.
Nuclear Energy is already clean. The problem is the 'radio-active' waste from the reactor. A lot of research is going on to dispose of radio-active waste safely. One possibility is 'vitrifiction' and then burying it in deep mines.
Nuclear wastes are sometimes said to be a problem too difficult to solve because the waste stays radioactive for so long. The only thing that gets rid of nuclear waste is time.
There was no testing done at Yucca mountain; it is just a place where they plan on storing nuclear waste in order to dispose of it.
No physical or chemical process can alter the radioactivity of the waste, so it will still be there whatever you do with it. If the volcano is active, when the next lava flow occurs the nuclear waste will be ejected with the volcanic matter, so it would be a very bad idea. The idea for long term waste disposal is to find somewhere very geologically stable where it will stay for thousands of years without any risk of returning to the earth's surface, just the opposite of the volcano's contents.
you dispose it properly where it will not harm anything or anybody.
Probably but the need to secure and dispose of nuclear waste must be considered as well as other energy sources like wind, geo-thermal. solar and tides.
pisot