Some of the wildlife species hardest hit so far by global warming include caribou (reindeer), arctic foxes, toads, polar bears, penguins, gray wolves, tree swallows, painted turtles and salmon. The group fears that unless we take decisive steps to reverse global warming, more and more species will join the list of wildlife populations pushed to the brink of extinction by a changing climate.
Wolves, as far as we know, are not affected by global warming.
Algae and fungi are green and gray
The two most well qualified atmospheric scientists to cast doubt on the science of global warming are Richard Lindzen, Pubs Alfred P. Sloan Professor of Atmospheric Science at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and member of the National Academy of Sciences, and Garth Paltridge, Pubs Visiting Fellow ANU and retired Chief Research Scientist, CSIRO Division of Atmospheric Research and retired Director of the Institute of the Antarctic Cooperative Research Centre.In 2001, Richard Lindzen agreed that global warming is occurring and could be caused by increased carbon dioxide (CO2) levels but believed that scientists were not in a position to prove the connection. He said, "We are quite confident (1) that global mean temperature is about 0.5 °C higher than it was a century ago; (2) that atmospheric levels of CO2 have risen over the past two centuries; and (3) that CO2 is a greenhouse gas whose increase is likely to warm the earth (one of many, the most important being water vapor and clouds). But - and I cannot stress this enough - we are not in a position to confidently attribute past climate change to CO2 or to forecast what the climate will be in the future."In 2009, Garth Paltridge agreed that there are good reasons to believe that burning fossil fuels could lead to global warming, but was uncertain as to how significant this would be. He said, "There are good and straightforward scientific reasons to believe that the burning of fossil fuel and consequent increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide will lead to an increase in the average temperature of the world above that which would otherwise be the case. Whether the increase will be large enough to be noticeable is still an unanswered question."In September 2005 Willam M. Gray, Professor Emeritus and head of The Tropical Meteorology Project, Department of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University stated in an interview with Discovery Magazine: "This small warming is likely a result of the natural alterations in global ocean currents which are driven by ocean salinity variations. Ocean circulation variations are as yet little understood. Human kind has little or nothing to do with the recent temperature changes. We are not that influential."[...]"I am of the opinion that [global warming] is one of the greatest hoaxes ever perpetrated on the American people."[...]"So many people have a vested interest in this global-warming thing-all these big labs and research and stuff. The idea is to frighten the public, to get money to study it more."In 2007 Tim Patterson, Pubs paleoclimatologist and Professor of Geology at Calreton University, Canada wrote in the Financial Post: "There is no meaningful correlation between CO2 levels and Earth's temperature over this [geologic] time frame. In fact, when CO2 levels were over ten times higher than they are now, about 450 million years ago, the planet was in the depths of the absolute coldest period in the last half billion years. On the basis of this evidence, how could anyone still believe that the recent relatively small increase in CO2 levels would be the major cause of the past century's modest warming?"Tom Segalstad, head of the Geology Museum at the University of Oslo stated in his article "What is CO2 - friend of foe?": "The IPCC's temperature curve (the so-called 'hockey stick' curve) must be in error...human influence on the 'Greenhouse Effect' is minimal (maximum 4%). Anthropogenic CO2 amounts to 4% of the ~2% of the "Greenhouse Effect", hence an influence of less than 1 permil of the Earth's total natural 'Greenhouse Effect' (some 0.03 °C of the total ~33 °C)"
Gray Matter Interactive was created in 1994.
Alkali metals in Group I.
Wolves, as far as we know, are not affected by global warming.
Because most of them are dead.
Global warming can impact gray wolves by altering their habitat and food sources. Changes in temperature and precipitation patterns can shift the distribution of prey species, affecting the wolves' hunting success. Additionally, warmer temperatures can increase the prevalence of diseases that affect wolves, ultimately threatening their populations.
Many of the Grey wolfes are dying out because people are killing them and destroying their habitats
A Wolfe is a meat eater. Thoughe Wolfes and other canine are known to eat grass if they have dygestove problems
they're dying
Many animals will be effected by global warming such as polar bears because their habitat is melting and being destroyed many other animals will be effected as well. P.S. I'M ONLY 11 The amount of animals that are being threatened by global warming are extreme and drastic measures are needed. P.S. I'M 12 Louise! x hi Caitlin w
* galaxy * germination * geology * gas * granite * gastro-intestinal tract * gestation period * genius * gall bladder * gall stones * gynocologist * greenhouse gas * global warming * greenhouse effect * gray matter * geriatrics
Hunters. (People thats hunt wolves) Well, I'm not an expert, but I don't think so. Although gray wolves can be killed by other animals if they get into a fight, they are generally the main predators in their environment. I don't know if this helps you, but I hope it does. Wolves are probably the main predators of their habitat but may get killed in a fight with their prey, a forest predator fighting over food, or rarely another wolf in a fight. But grown wolves do not have a main predator, I think they are top of the food chain for their envirounment. Although sometimes bears may dig up wolf dens and kill and eat the pups. ): im pretty sure that their only predator is humans... also im not sure but i think that global warming has affected them.
There is no way to answer with 100 percent accuracy what the planet Earth will look like in the year 2025. That said, many intellectuals believe four core truths will occur. These are a more multilateral world, a need for sustainability, continued global warming, and a more ethnic population.
it was gray!!!! yup. gray.
Gray.