Yes, more alike DNA sequences typically indicate a closer evolutionary relationship between species. When DNA sequences are similar, it suggests that the species share a more recent common ancestor. Conversely, greater differences in DNA sequences imply a longer evolutionary divergence. Thus, genetic similarity can be a strong indicator of relatedness among species.
Because they are more different than they are alike.
A. species
When two unrelated organisms look alike, it is called convergent evolution. In the case of sharks and dolphins, they have evolved similar streamlined body shapes for efficient swimming in their aquatic environments, despite not being closely related. This similarity in appearance is an example of convergent evolution driven by similar environmental pressures.
That means animals are of the same kind even though they don't look alike.
Embryos from different animals are alike because they share common developmental processes and genetic pathways. This is a result of evolution, where many animal species have retained similar genetic instructions for early development. These similarities can be traced back to a common ancestor from which these different species have evolved.
Being alike. Something closely related to another thing.
Organisms in the same family
They may look alike yet I don't think they are closely related.
Another word for closely related could be: - Connected - Akin - Alike - Complementary - Correlated - Dependent - Enmeshed - Interchangeable - Interconnected - Interdependent - Interrelated - Intertwined - Interwoven - Like - Similar
they are alike
True
Red pandas and giant pandas are not alike. They are two different species of animal. Red pandas are related to raccoons whereas giant pandas are bears.
they are not
Yes, pandas are related to all other bear species.
Well.......they are both endangered (obviously) and they both produce their young sexually, but the monarch butterfly and the ground squirrel are not closely related at all.
Though they look alike, they are not related!No, but they do look alike.
Because they are more different than they are alike.