Neutrons are 1836.128973 times more massive than an electron, which can be rounded up to 2000 if it so pleases you.
The electron has very little mass compared to the proton or neutron.
yes the mass of an electron is much tinnier fraction of the mass of an atom
A proton has a positive electrical charge and is approximately 2000 times the mass of an electron.
No, it is not. Almost all of the mass of an atom is located in the nucleus. The proton, that carrier of the positive electrical charge, is some 1836 times more massive that the negatively charged electron that it attracts to "build" an atom. If we take a look, we'll find that in a simple hydrogen-1 atom, a single proton is in the nucleus and a lone electron makes up the electron cloud. And the nucleus is about 1836 times more massive than the "rest" of the atom. In a helium-4 atom, two protons and two neutrons form the nucleus and a pair of electrons form the electron cloud. In this case, the nucleus is about 7,444 times as massive as the electrons. As we move up the periodic table, the figure gets even more lopsided.
the answer to this question is electron the answer to this question is electron
No - it is 2000 times (approx) less massive and just can not acquire the mass.
Absolutely; a proton weighs approximately 2000 times more than an electron.
No, it is not. They are about the same size and have about the same mass. The electron, on the other hand, is tiny by comparison. The proton is about 1836 times as massive as an electron.
The electron has very little mass compared to the proton or neutron.
99.9% of an atom's mass is concentrated in the nucleus, with protons and neutrons having almost the same mass, with neutrons being slightly higher. So your question would be, 'What atom has the most protons and neutrons combined?' And that answer is Nobelium. Nobelium has 102 protons and 160 neutrons which makes it the most 'massive' atomic particle, even more so then Lawrencium which has 103 protons but only 159 neutrons. Of course, in a few months, we could have a new, more massive element.
yes the mass of an electron is much tinnier fraction of the mass of an atom
A proton has a positive electrical charge and is approximately 2000 times the mass of an electron.
The mass of a proton is 2000 times the mass of an electron. Mass of electron: 9.10938 * 10-31 kg Mass of proton: 1.67262 * 10-27 kg Mass of neutron: 1.67493 * 10-27 kg Note that protons and neutrons weigh approximately the same (neutrons are slightly heavier), but electrons are MUCH lighter than both of them. The MASS of the electron is much smaller than neutrons and protons. It is common, but incorrect, to use mass and weight interchangeably. They are not synonymous.
No, it is not. Almost all of the mass of an atom is located in the nucleus. The proton, that carrier of the positive electrical charge, is some 1836 times more massive that the negatively charged electron that it attracts to "build" an atom. If we take a look, we'll find that in a simple hydrogen-1 atom, a single proton is in the nucleus and a lone electron makes up the electron cloud. And the nucleus is about 1836 times more massive than the "rest" of the atom. In a helium-4 atom, two protons and two neutrons form the nucleus and a pair of electrons form the electron cloud. In this case, the nucleus is about 7,444 times as massive as the electrons. As we move up the periodic table, the figure gets even more lopsided.
A neutron is actually heavier than a proton because a neutron is made up of a proton + an electron + subatomic particles. The relative masses are: * Mass of neutron: 1,6749 x 10^(-27) kg * Mass of proton : 1,6726 x 10^(-27) kg * Mass of electron: 0,00091x10^(-27) kg
the answer to this question is electron the answer to this question is electron
The proton mass is about 2,000 times greater than the electron mass.