Viruses are considered non-living because they do not use 6 of the seven life proceses
Viruses require a living organism to do anything - most especially to reproduce.
Viruses are not alive in the first place, so no.
The true statement is that viruses are not living. Unlike living organisms, viruses lack cellular structures and cannot reproduce or produce energy on their own; they require a host cell to replicate and carry out their functions. Therefore, they do not possess organelles or the ability to reproduce independently.
Viruses can reproduce very quickly. When reproducing they enter a living cell and they inject their genetic material.
A disease can be biotic or abiotic. If it is a bacteria it is biotic, but if it is a virus it is always abiotic, because viruses are not considered living because they cannot reproduce on there own, do not consume energy or give off waist.
viruses are non living and bacteria are living organisms
There actually living
Viruses depend on living cells because they reproduce inside of them.
Viruses need living cells to produce more viruses. They are obliged to use living cells.
Viruses require a living organism to do anything - most especially to reproduce.
Viruses require a living organism to do anything - most especially to reproduce.
They don't. They are non-living.
Viruses do not meet their qualifications to be a living organism.
They are Different because Viruses are nonliving.
Viruses are not alive in the first place, so no.
Viruses can reproduce very quickly. When reproducing they enter a living cell and they inject their genetic material.
Viruses are not alive. They are infectious particles. They hijack a living cell's DNA and force it to make viruses parts instead of living cell parts. The cell is made to assemble to parts and the new viruses bust out of the cell, killing it, and infect more cells.