0
What else can I help you with?
Why is nuclear fusion a potentially safer energy source?
Fusion reactors are very much safer because-- 1) They can't "run away" 2) They leave few radioactive products when worn out. 3) They have no radioactive spent fuel. 4) They don't become dangerous if anything fails, they just stop.
What is the solution to illegal sale of human organs?
Cloning would solve the problem by creating an ample supply.
How do you find kinetic energy if no final velocity is given?
You can calculate kinetic energy using the formula KE = 0.5 * m * v^2, where m is the mass of the object and v is its velocity. If the final velocity is not given, you would need more information or assumptions to solve for kinetic energy.
What problem was Marie curie trying to solve?
Marie Curie was trying to solve the problem of understanding radioactivity and its effects on the human body. She conducted groundbreaking research on the properties of radioactive elements such as radium and polonium, which laid the foundation for the field of nuclear physics. Her work also led to the development of new medical treatments and diagnostic techniques.
What would be the skaters speed if all the potential energy could be converted into kinetic energy?
Clearly, that depends on the amount of potential energy. If given the height, calculate the potential energy with the formula for gravitational potential energy (PE = mgh). If mass is not given, you can assume any mass (it doesn't affect the result), or use a variable "m". Then, assuming it gets converted to kinetic energy, use the formula for kinetic energy (KE = (1/2)mv2), replace the KE with the energy you calculated before, and solve for v (the speed).
Describe the energy of nuclear fusion?
Nuclear fusion has not yet been achieved on Earth but it is the process by which the un and stars are believed to gain their energy. At the moment nuclear reactors use nuclear fission, which is the splitting of radioactive nucleii. Nuclear fussion is the combining, or the fusion, of atoms which would release much much more energy. Many scientists believe that this is the way we need to go to solve the energy crisis.
How can we solve the problem of nuclear fusion needing such high temperatures?
There's the rub, if I could answer that I would be rich and famous.
Why isn't sonoluminessence being developed more to help solve the fossilfuel crisis?
because is has not yet been vearyfied that nuclear fusion takes place
Can a nuclear plant is necessary in order to solve the power criss of a country?
No, there are lots of ways to get energy.
Are you in favor of restoration of Bataan Nuclear Power Plant to solve energy crisis in the Philippines Justify your answer?
Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it! Do it!
Which is NOT a factor in why nuclear energy has failed to live up to the initial hopes that it would solve nations' energy needed?
Available plutonium and uranium are reserved for nuclear weapons is not a factor in why nuclear energy has failed to live up to the hopes that it would solve the nations' energy needed. Many people worry about the safety of nuclear reactors.
What type of energy released during nuclear fusion?
Nuclear fusion is how the stars including our sun obtain their energy, where the results of the fusion are contained in the star's material and appear as thermal energy. In proposed fusion reactors on earth, a hot plasma containing atoms of deuterium and tritium (both isotopes of hydrogen) is confined in a magnetic field and made to react by heating. The idea is that by feeding in these components a power reaction would be made to be continuous. So far experimental rigs have made fusion happen but only for short times, less than 1 second. A larger experiment called ITER is planned, but it will still only be to demonstrate fusion, not to extract power. From the reaction D + T, most of the output energy will appear as energetic neutrons, and there will also be radiated heat from the plasma itself. Somehow the energy of the neutrons has to be captured, and this is likely to be as difficult to solve as the plasma reaction itself. Some material will be required which can absorb the neutrons, resulting in thermal heating, which can then be transferred to a steam cycle for power production. When one realises that this material will have to stand up to neutron bombardment for the life of the plant, it becomes apparent that this will be a big problem. My own feeling is that nobody alive today is likely to see fusion in operation as a power source.
What is the unsolved problem of nuclear energy?
One of the unsolved problems of nuclear energy is the issue of long-term storage and disposal of radioactive waste. Finding a safe and sustainable solution for the disposal of nuclear waste, which remains hazardous for thousands of years, is a major challenge facing the nuclear energy industry.
How would you solve Japan's nuclear power or energy problem that has arisen after the earthquake and tsunami?
Get some massive wireless energy transfer devise and set one up on the moon and one in japan. Transfer power from a massive nuclear power plant on the moon to Japan and hook everyone up to it.
Which is NOT a factor in why nuclear energy has failed to live up to the initial hopes that it would solve nations' energy needs?
The nuclear energy has failed to live up to the initial hopes of helping a nationâ??s energy needs because of the misuse of technology to create chemical weapons. Lack of modern technology is not a reason for the failure.
How do you solve low voltage supply?
Put a seprate transformer. It will solve this issue
Why is nuclear fusion a potentially safer energy source?
Fusion reactors are very much safer because-- 1) They can't "run away" 2) They leave few radioactive products when worn out. 3) They have no radioactive spent fuel. 4) They don't become dangerous if anything fails, they just stop.
