answersLogoWhite

0

No, systematic risk cannot be eliminated by diversification. Systematic risk, also known as market risk, affects all securities and is tied to factors like economic changes, interest rates, and geopolitical events. While diversification can reduce unsystematic risk (specific to individual assets), it cannot mitigate the inherent risks that impact the entire market. Investors can, however, manage systematic risk through strategies like asset allocation and hedging.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

2mo ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Natural Sciences

What is systematic risk?

Systematic risk, also known as market risk, refers to the inherent risk that affects the entire market or a large segment of it, rather than a specific company or industry. This type of risk arises from factors such as economic downturns, political instability, or changes in interest rates, which can impact all investments. Unlike unsystematic risk, which can be mitigated through diversification, systematic risk cannot be eliminated and must be managed through strategies like asset allocation. Investors often measure systematic risk using beta, which indicates how a security's price moves in relation to the overall market.


What is the appropriate measure of risk for an asset held in a diversified portfolio?

The appropriate measure of risk for an asset held in a diversified portfolio is its systematic risk, often quantified by beta. Beta reflects the asset's sensitivity to market movements and indicates how much the asset's returns are expected to change in relation to changes in the overall market. Unlike total risk, which includes unsystematic risk that can be mitigated through diversification, systematic risk captures the inherent risk associated with market-wide factors. Thus, for investors in a diversified portfolio, beta is the key metric for assessing an asset's contribution to overall portfolio risk.


What are the two key ideas of modern portfolio theory?

The two key ideas of modern portfolio theory are diversification and the trade-off between risk and return. Diversification involves spreading investments across different assets to reduce risk, while the risk-return trade-off suggests that investors should seek an optimal balance between risk and potential return based on their risk tolerance.


What are systematics?

Systematics is the scientific study of the diversification of living organisms, their relationships, and classification into hierarchical groupings. It aims to reconstruct the evolutionary history of species based on shared characteristics and genetic relationships, ultimately providing a framework for understanding the diversity of life on Earth.


What happens when derstification occurs?

Diversification occurs when a company expands its product line or enters new markets to reduce risk and increase revenue sources. It can help to stabilize the business by spreading out investments and opportunities for growth. However, diversification can also lead to higher costs, lack of focus, and potential dilution of brand identity if not managed effectively.

Related Questions

What is the diversification of Risk?

Diversification of risk means reduction of risk. Merely reducing risk (and thereby reducing return proportionately) doesn't amount to diversification. Diversification in its true sense represents systematic reduction of risk in such a manner that return per unit of risk increases. By K S JOLLY


Which type of risk can be reduce through diversification?

Diversification primarily reduces unsystematic risk, which is the risk associated with individual assets or specific sectors. By spreading investments across a variety of assets, such as stocks, bonds, and real estate, investors can mitigate the impact of poor performance from any single investment. However, systematic risk, or market risk, which affects all investments due to economic factors, cannot be eliminated through diversification.


What is systematic risk?

Systematic risk, also known as market risk, refers to the inherent risk that affects the entire market or a large segment of it, rather than a specific company or industry. This type of risk arises from factors such as economic downturns, political instability, or changes in interest rates, which can impact all investments. Unlike unsystematic risk, which can be mitigated through diversification, systematic risk cannot be eliminated and must be managed through strategies like asset allocation. Investors often measure systematic risk using beta, which indicates how a security's price moves in relation to the overall market.


Can diversify firm specific risk at all?

Yes, firms can diversify firm-specific risk, which is the risk associated with individual companies that can be mitigated through diversification. By investing in a variety of assets across different industries and sectors, investors can reduce the impact of any single company's poor performance on their overall portfolio. However, firm-specific risk cannot be eliminated entirely; it can only be reduced through effective diversification strategies. Ultimately, systematic risk, which affects the entire market, remains unavoidable and cannot be diversified away.


What is contrast systematic and unsystematic risk?

Systematic risk, also known as market risk, affects the overall market and cannot be diversified away. It includes factors like interest rates, inflation, and economic downturns. Unsystematic risk, also known as specific risk, is unique to a particular company or industry and can be minimized through diversification. It includes factors like management changes, lawsuits, and competition.


What are the two types of risk?

The two primary types of risk are systematic risk and unsystematic risk. Systematic risk, also known as market risk, affects the entire market or economy and cannot be diversified away, such as changes in interest rates or economic recessions. Unsystematic risk, on the other hand, is specific to a particular company or industry and can be mitigated through diversification, like a company's poor management or operational issues.


Why there no reason to believe that the market will reward investor with additional return for assuming unsystematic risk?

There is no reason to believe that the market will reward investors for assuming unsystematic risk because this type of risk is specific to individual assets and can be diversified away. As investors build diversified portfolios, the unique risks associated with individual securities diminish, leading to the conclusion that only systematic risk, which affects the entire market, is compensated through higher expected returns. Therefore, the market does not provide an additional return for bearing risks that can be eliminated through diversification.


Does standard deviation measure systematic or unsystematic risk?

Standard deviation is a measure of total risk, or both systematic and unsystematic risk. Unsystematic risk can be diversified away, systematic risk cannot and is measured as Beta.


What type of risk is avoidable through proper diversification?

portfolio risk


What is the appropriate measure of risk for an asset held in a diversified portfolio?

The appropriate measure of risk for an asset held in a diversified portfolio is its systematic risk, often quantified by beta. Beta reflects the asset's sensitivity to market movements and indicates how much the asset's returns are expected to change in relation to changes in the overall market. Unlike total risk, which includes unsystematic risk that can be mitigated through diversification, systematic risk captures the inherent risk associated with market-wide factors. Thus, for investors in a diversified portfolio, beta is the key metric for assessing an asset's contribution to overall portfolio risk.


Diversification is an investment strategy to?

Diversification enables the investor to reduce risk by spreading investments among different companies and types of investing.


How does diversification affect financial institions credit risk exposure?

Generally, diversification helps reduce the overall credit risk exposure for financial institutions by reducing their overall expected chargeoff rates.