answersLogoWhite

0

Yes- provided its proof does not depend on the result you are using it to prove.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What types of statement can be used to explain the steps of a proof?

The corollaries types of statement is what is used to explain the steps of a proof.


What types of the statement can be used to explain the steps of a proof?

The corollaries types of statement is what is used to explain the steps of a proof.


What is used to explain a statement in a geometric proof?

Postulate, Corollary, Definition, & Theorem


Which types of statements can justify the steps of proof?

Theorems, definitions, corollaries, and postulates


which of the following reasons can be used for statement 3 of the proof of the exterior angle theorem?

triangle sum theorem


Which of the following types of statement cannot be used to justify the steps of a proof check all that apply a guess b theorem c conjecture d postulate?

Guess Conjecture


What is used to support steps of a geometric proof?

Steps in a geometric proof do not require support


Which of the following types of statement cannot be used to explain the steps of a proof Check all that apply?

Conjecture and Guess.


What can be used to justify a statement in a geometric proof?

definition,postulate,theorem,& CorollaryDefinition, Theorem, Corollary, and PostulateA.PostulateB.DefinitionD.Algebraic property(answers for apex)a and cpostulate, theorem, and definition


which of the following reasons can be used for statement 3 of the proof?

alternate exterior angles theorem


What type of statement cannot be used to explain the steps of a proof?

A statement that is subjective, ambiguous, or based on opinion cannot be used to explain the steps of a proof. In a mathematical proof, each step must be based on objective facts, definitions, axioms, or previously proven theorems in order to ensure the validity and rigor of the argument. Statements that rely on personal beliefs, feelings, or interpretations are not suitable for constructing a logical proof.


Can a postulate be used to justify the steps of a proof?

no