YES. Infact, an object can have infinitely different moment of inertias. It all depends on the axis about which it it rotating.
You can allow an object to rotate about any axis (this may or may not pass through the object).
No, the inertia of a bowling ball is greater than the inertia of a basketball due to the bowling ball's larger mass. Inertia is the resistance of an object to changes in its state of motion, and a heavier object like the bowling ball requires more force to accelerate or decelerate compared to the basketball.
The mass of the gasses that make up our atmosphere weigh much more than the human population (1 trillionth of the earths mass) and move opportunistically into dense and low density pockets in all positions at all times on the globe and they have absolutely no effect on the rotational inertia. Consider the earth is not a solid mass inside or out, it is basically a hydraulic dampener. Now if you could generate sufficient vibration waves in order to harmonically disrupt the fluid dampening effect it would be possible for the system to fault and the earth to throw a bulge.
A large truck parked in a lot has greater inertia compared to a moving toy car. Inertia is the resistance of an object to changes in its state of motion, and it depends on the mass of the object. Since the truck has significantly more mass than the toy car, it will have more inertia, making it harder to start moving or stop compared to the toy car.
A speeding car and a jet on a runway would have roughly the same amount of inertia, as both objects have mass and are in motion. Inertia is a property of an object that resists changes in its motion, and is directly proportional to the object's mass. Therefore, the greater the mass, the greater the inertia.
A large truck typically has more inertia than a small car because inertia is directly proportional to an object's mass. The greater mass of the truck means it will resist changes in its state of motion more than the smaller car.
No. For the rotational inertia, the distribution of masses is relevant. Mass further from the axis of rotation contributes more to the rotational inertial than mass that is closer to it.
Because it is a measure of the "resistence" of an object to be accelerated in its rotation. An object with a big moment of inertia is more difficult to increase/decrease its angular velocity (speed of rotation), than an object with a low moment of inertia.
Answer #1:The Rotational Inertia of an object increases as the mass "increases" and thedistance of the mass from the center of rotation "decreases".=================================Answer #2:If Answer #1 were correct, then flywheels would be made as small as possible,and a marble would be harder to spin than a wagon wheel is.An object's rotational inertia (moment of inertia) increases in direct proportionto its mass, and increases in proportion to the square of the distance of themass from the center of rotation.
An object with a higher mass would have more inertia than a 5kg object. Inertia is directly related to an object's mass - the greater the mass, the greater the inertia. So, any object that weighs more than 5kg would have more inertia.
Any object that has a mass greater than 100 gram, will also have more inertia. By the way whether it is on Earth or not is irrelevant. If you take a 100-gram mass anywhere else, it will still have 100 gram; and the inertia (which depends on the mass) will also be the same.
Since momentum (force in motion) is a measurement of mass times velocity, a heavier object traveling at the same speed as a lighter object will have more force behind it.
The basketball has more inertia because it has more mass than a penny. Inertia is directly related to an object's mass - the larger the mass, the greater the inertia.
A hammer would hit the ground first because a hammer is heavier
The mass of an object is a factor that determines its inertia. Objects with more mass have greater inertia, meaning they resist changes in their motion more than objects with less mass.
Yes, inertia is the tendency of an object to resist changes in its state of motion. Heavier objects have more inertia than lighter objects because they require more force to accelerate or decelerate.
The Sun has more inertia than the Moon because it has a much greater mass. Inertia is the resistance of an object to changes in its motion, and it is directly proportional to an object's mass. Since the Sun is much larger and more massive than the Moon, it has greater inertia.
Given the question as is, neither - objects have to be in motion in order to have inertia, and your question does nothing to state that they are.