Yes, "has" and "had" can be used for non-living things when indicating possession or characteristics. For example, "The car has a powerful engine," or "The building had a unique design." In these cases, "has" and "had" function to describe attributes or ownership, even though the subjects are inanimate.
They are literally non living but you could use a metaphor to say that it is living
If you need an example for humans, we use houses (non living) for shelter, which helps us survive. We aso use weapons (non living) to kill animals that attack us so we can survive. If I'm a wolf or something, then I use caves for shelter.
they don't... if you think about it, everything is living...
A phone battery
Non living.
They are literally non living but you could use a metaphor to say that it is living
"in a museum there are many non living animals on display."
If you need an example for humans, we use houses (non living) for shelter, which helps us survive. We aso use weapons (non living) to kill animals that attack us so we can survive. If I'm a wolf or something, then I use caves for shelter.
Abiotic factors (non living) that whales use include oxygen, water, sunlight and vibrations (sound waves).
they don't... if you think about it, everything is living...
non-living non-living
A phone battery
Non living
not living
Non living.
living
It is non-living.