It's possible to produce gold from other elements using highly complicated extremely expensive equipment. However: * It's produced in incredibly minute quantities; * It takes enormous amounts of power. The power costs alone are more than the gold is worth.
I currently use nuclear fusion.
Nuclear fusion does not currently occur in nuclear plants. Nuclear plants use nuclear fission, where atoms are split to release energy. Fusion reactions, in which atomic nuclei combine to release energy, are not yet used commercially for electricity generation.
No, a nuclear power plant producing electricity is an example of nuclear fission, not fusion. In nuclear fission, the nucleus of an atom is split, releasing energy, whereas in nuclear fusion, atomic nuclei combine to release energy.
Because no one has been able to produce a continuous fusion reaction so far.
No, a fission reaction is not necessary to trigger a fusion reaction, but for us on earth, it is. In the field of nuclear weapons, a fission bomb is needed to create the heat necessary to set off a fusion weapon. We have to use fission, or, rather, the energy created by that, to initiate the fusion reaction. It might be possible to use a high power source, like a laser, on a small amount of material to get fusion to occur. But we are still experimenting with this in the Tokamak, and it's far from being a done deal. Stars are, in general, massive nuclear fusion reactors. Their constant consumption of fuel powering their high rate of fusion creates a massive amount of energy, and the stars' huge gravity keeps this process from blowing the whole thing apart. No fission is needed to sustain this reaction.
nuclear fusion.
I currently use nuclear fusion.
Nuclear fusion does not currently occur in nuclear plants. Nuclear plants use nuclear fission, where atoms are split to release energy. Fusion reactions, in which atomic nuclei combine to release energy, are not yet used commercially for electricity generation.
Nuclear fusion is not used for any purpose at present, it is still in the experimental phase
There is no use made except in nuclear weapons. Attempts to make fusion happen on earth in a controlled way for power production have not succeeded yet.
Nuclear bombs can use either nuclear fission or nuclear fusion as the primary mechanism of energy release. Most nuclear bombs in current arsenals rely on nuclear fission reactions, while thermonuclear bombs use a fission reaction to trigger a fusion reaction.
Nuclear fusion rocket technology is too expensive to use as a means for power production.
Nuclear fission is the method currently used for generating energy, while nuclear fusion is still being developed for practical use.
No, a nuclear power plant producing electricity is an example of nuclear fission, not fusion. In nuclear fission, the nucleus of an atom is split, releasing energy, whereas in nuclear fusion, atomic nuclei combine to release energy.
Because it is a fission process, not fusion
There is very little similarity between present day power plants which use nuclear fission, and any possible nuclear fusion plant of the future
Nuclear fusion is unsure now at industrial scale.