Yes they are called vegetarians.
Eat plants like fruits, cereal grains, nuts, and seeds and so on, with or without dairy products and eggs.
The loss of an important population of animals or plants could create a ripple effect throughout the ecosystem. It may disrupt food chains, alter habitat structure, and lead to imbalances in population dynamics. This could ultimately impact biodiversity, ecosystem stability, and the services provided by the ecosystem.
A wolf does not need plants to survive. It needs to be able to hunt small animals for food. A good example of a wolf that lives in an ecosystem without plants is the Arctic white wolf. They live on the tundra and hunt the small animals that live there.
Look around, since even a changed ecosystem is still an ecosystem.
Many of the plants and animals would die because they couldn't adjust to the change in the amount of salt in the water. Some animals would move to different areas. Some plants and animals may be able to adjust and survive. (direct from the answer key.. I'd suggest you use your own words!)
the new plants could kill the other plants by lilyn
Look around, since even a changed ecosystem is still an ecosystem
The loss of an important population of animals or plants could create a ripple effect throughout the ecosystem. It may disrupt food chains, alter habitat structure, and lead to imbalances in population dynamics. This could ultimately impact biodiversity, ecosystem stability, and the services provided by the ecosystem.
A wolf does not need plants to survive. It needs to be able to hunt small animals for food. A good example of a wolf that lives in an ecosystem without plants is the Arctic white wolf. They live on the tundra and hunt the small animals that live there.
Look around, since even a changed ecosystem is still an ecosystem.
People are "animals". Animals can not make their own food they have to eat other animals and or plants to survive. Plants can make their own food (from air, water and sunlight) - they are the basis of all food - without plants there could be no animals.
Plants depend on animals for pollination, seed dispersal, and protection from pests. Animals help plants reproduce by carrying pollen between flowers, spreading seeds to new locations, and eating pests that could harm the plant. This mutual relationship benefits both plants and animals in the ecosystem.
Hawaii was created in relative isolation and had a unique ecosystem with flora and fauna that could not be found elsewhere.
hahahahahahahahahah. People, trees ,grass ,plants, etc. The living parts of an ecosystem is the biotic factors.
Many of the plants and animals would die because they couldn't adjust to the change in the amount of salt in the water. Some animals would move to different areas. Some plants and animals may be able to adjust and survive. (direct from the answer key.. I'd suggest you use your own words!)
the new plants could kill the other plants by lilyn
If all decomposers were removed from a temperate forest ecosystem, organic matter such as dead plants and animals would accumulate, leading to nutrient depletion in the soil. This would disrupt the nutrient cycling process, ultimately affecting plant growth and the overall health of the ecosystem. Over time, the lack of decomposition would result in a decline in biodiversity, as plants and animals struggle to survive in an unbalanced environment. The ecosystem could eventually collapse, leading to significant changes in its structure and function.
The plants would grow too much, and it would become an overgrown forest, which could give bad animals more homes.