Yes they can. But they prefer to use animals because they have the same organs. Brain, lungs, etc.
Since animals cannot make their own food they are all ultimately dependent on plants for survival. Some plants could probably get along without animals, but many rely on various species for services like pollination and seed dispersal.
Plants provide food and nutrients to animals, which are essential for their survival and health. Additionally, plants provide shelter and habitat for animals, offering protection from predators and harsh weather conditions. Some animals also rely on plants for nesting materials and as sources of water.
No. They could not under the current regime of life on Earth. Bacteria, in their symbiotic, detrivorous, and other roles are critical to the life functions of plants and animals. If all bacteria were to die out, it is likely that everything living on the planet would die out. Oddly enough, the bacteria could survive without animals or plants.
Green plants use a process called photosynthesis to make food from sunlight. Only green plants can make their own food. Other plants (like mushrooms) and animals do not make their own food, but get nutrition from green plants (or dead green plants). Animals do not make food from sunlight. If they could, they would not need to eat.
You may find the following plants and animals in the woods:Animals:squirrelsfoxesbadgersbirdsfrogs/toadsrats/micePlants:treesdaisiesdaffodils
Animals can die from cosmetic testing as could humans.
Animals are tested because they are healthy and no disease they could possibly have or any meds they are on will effect what they are doing with the testing.
No, because the plants depend on the sun, the animals depend on the plants, we depend on both the animals and the plants. Der.
in my opinion i think its terrible to test on poor animals , but in a way there are two sides to it it is obviously much better then having to test on a human, as it could harm them but animals could get hurt too !
Plants could clean and heal the body. Plants can also clean animals internally, when taken orally.
There are a number of animals that uproot plants. The culprit could be an opossum, a raccoon, a rabbit, or a muskrat.
No because animals eat plants so if animals didnt eat plants the plants would die unless watered.
so the animals living there could continue livingso that the plants could survive and the herbivores could eat the plants
People could still have reactions to the product that was tested on animals!!! People could still have reactions to the product that was tested on animals!!!
Probably because the dry climate limited the amount and variety of plants and animals that they could have hunted or gathered.
Plants and animals are fundamental to ecological balance. Plants could exist without animals but animals could not live without plants. Without animals plants would eventually stabilise to a new level of ecological equilibrium.
They would say how stupid humans are for testing on them and thinking that just because animals don't look like humans, they don't have feelings...I wish animals could talk.