No.
As a matter the fact, the ABSENCE of anti-matter in our Universe is a problem scientists are still trying to explain. We know that anti-matter is almost non-existent here, but our present theories can give no reason why that should have happened -- any more than our present scientific theories can explain where lightning comes from. In both cases, scientists are working on developing better theoretical understanding.
You are giving the definition for the Big Bang Theory.
The question itself is a little unclear, but one of the open questions in cosmology is why there appears to be an imbalance in the amounts of matter and antimatter in the universe. This doesn't mean the Big Bang theory is incorrect, it just means that there's a piece that hasn't been explained yet.
1. Why is there more matter than antimatter in the Universe? Or: Why is there matter at all? (If there were the same amount of matter and antimatter, and it came into contact, it would quickly get destroyed. 2. If antimatter is so abundant, how come we've never come in contact with it or have been able to observe it?
The big bang was a cosmic explosion in which the universe was created. Temperatures were so high that random motions of particles were at relativistic speeds and that the only matter that could exist in such conditions was antimatter.
Events in the Universe are often dated from the Big Bang. But the fact is, NOBODY KNOWS what (if anything) happened before the Big Bang. The Big Bang MAY have been the start of time itself; but it is possible that the Universe existed (in some form) forever in the past.
Scientists "speculate" that the Big Bang created antimatter, but it was destroyed when coming into contact with stars, planets, and other matter.
You are giving the definition for the Big Bang Theory.
The spread of mass and space. The matter-antimatter collisions HAD to happen after the big bang.
The question itself is a little unclear, but one of the open questions in cosmology is why there appears to be an imbalance in the amounts of matter and antimatter in the universe. This doesn't mean the Big Bang theory is incorrect, it just means that there's a piece that hasn't been explained yet.
the big bang.
By recreating Big Bang conditions, scientists at CERN trie to answer following questions:Why is there no-more antimatter left, although both, matter and antimatter were resulting from the Big Bang in equal parts and thus, should've annihilate themselves?Why do particles have mass? What is mass? Is the origin of mass the Higgs-boson?Does dark matter exist? What is dark matter?Do extra dimensions exist?
By recreating Big Bang conditions, scientists at CERN trie to answer following questions:Why is there no-more antimatter left, although both, matter and antimatter were resulting from the Big Bang in equal parts and thus, should've annihilate themselves?Why do particles have mass? What is mass? Is the origin of mass the Higgs-boson?Does dark matter exist? What is dark matter?Do extra dimensions exist?
The TV show Big Bang Theory first Premiered on September 24, 2007 on CBS.
The Universe was created by the big bang. The World or Earth, was formed about 9 billion years later from stellar debris and materials created by the big bang.
The Big Bang theory and the modern evolutionary synthesis are two completely unrelated scientific theories. One did not start the other.
Big Bang Cosmology deals with the start (not necessary a creation) of our Universe as a whole, not with our Earth.
The big bang is basically what caused everything, so it pretty much is the first thing that happened