By definition all plants are muticellular eukaryote organisms.
i luv jeezus he must get rid of ogers and der stank pusses
From wikipedia.org Organs exist in all higher biological organisms, in particular they are not restricted to animals, but can also be identified in plants. In single-cell organisms like bacteria, the functional analogues of organs are called organelles.
yes we have organ and we are organisms
organ is bigger
By definition all plants are muticellular eukaryote organisms.
i luv jeezus he must get rid of ogers and der stank pusses
All the living organisms in the water died when I added to much bleach.
is all part of an organ
Not every organism need organs.Unicellular organisms do not have any way.
It is many cells see multi is another word for multiple and multiple means more so more cells
No. Organ systems only develop in larger, complex organisms. E.g. amoeba, a single celled organism, is small enough that all its needs can be obtained by the relevant organelles through diffusion. A dog, a large multi-cellular organisms, needs a system to deliver its requirements to the necessary tissues .
No. Single celled organisms such as amoeba obviously don't have them. Slightly more complex organisms such as sponges don't have organs or organ systems though they might be said to have tissues.
From wikipedia.org Organs exist in all higher biological organisms, in particular they are not restricted to animals, but can also be identified in plants. In single-cell organisms like bacteria, the functional analogues of organs are called organelles.
yes we have organ and we are organisms
No, because if you have a single celled organism, you don't have enough cells to make a tissue, so you won't have enough tissue to make organs, and you won't have any organs to create an organ system.
organ is bigger