If they appear at all, they're larger than they "really are", because they don't actually exist in the sense of being physical objects.
Maybe you're asking a different question related to a particular type of map projection? If so, which one?
The North pole and South pole are smaller than they are
The poles are not actual places, and so they don't have size. Antartica is a larger area than the Arctic. It is also a continent, whereas around the north pole the Arctic is just ice.
The polar projection, specifically the azimuthal polar projection, stretches out the area around the North and South poles. This type of projection represents the polar regions accurately but distorts the size and shape of landmasses as one moves away from the poles. Consequently, countries and continents near the equator appear smaller than they actually are, while those near the poles appear much larger.
The South Pole has larger icebergs compared to the North Pole. Antarctica, near the South Pole, has massive ice shelves that produce huge icebergs when they break off. The North Pole, on the other hand, consists mostly of floating sea ice, which generally results in smaller icebergs.
All stars appear to move due to Earth's rotation, but the Pole Star, also known as Polaris, remains in a relatively fixed position in the sky because it is located almost directly above Earth's North Pole. This causes it to appear stationary as other stars appear to rotate around it.
Finland is larger than North Carolina.
The North pole and South pole are smaller than they are
The area of North America has not changed significantly since the end of the last Ice Age.
It is one of the smaller glaciers in Iceland. It is located north of Skogar and west of a larger glacier, Mýrdalsjökull.
Yes North America is about 2.5 times larger than China.
The poles are not actual places, and so they don't have size. Antartica is a larger area than the Arctic. It is also a continent, whereas around the north pole the Arctic is just ice.
It is one of the smaller glaciers in Iceland. It is located north of Skogar and west of a larger glacier, Mýrdalsjökull.
Mapping a 3D object using 2D technology always distorts the relative size of the object and its features. A globe may give you a more true idea of the size of land near -- North -- or under -- South -- the poles. You can shop for a true, continental true-size 2D map and review the actual size of continents compared with each other.
"Small" is a relative term. North Island is over 110,000 square miles and the South Island is slightly larger. When compared to Greenland, the North Island is about eight times smaller. Compared to the island of Hawaii, the North Island is about 10 times larger. In another comparison, the North Island is smaller than Honshu of Japan. The South Island is the world's 12th largest island and the North Island is the 14th.
Mapping a 3D object using 2D technology always distorts the relative size of the object and its features. A globe may give you a more true idea of the size of land near -- North -- or under -- South -- the poles. You can shop for a true, continental true-size 2D map and review the actual size of continents compared with each other.
Mapping a 3D object using 2D technology always distorts the relative size of the object and its features. A globe may give you a more true idea of the size of land near -- North -- or under -- South -- the poles. You can shop for a true, continental true-size 2D map and review the actual size of continents compared with each other.
The Pacific Ocean is the largest and deepest ocean of the four: Indian, Arctic, Atlantic, and Pacific Oceans. Thus, the Arctic Ocean is smaller. When comparing the north Pacific Ocean, the Arctic Ocean is still smaller.