of course I agree because losing an animal is better than using a humane and the black death disease animal caused for the people this disease but this is the nature of the animal .
I would use research on / research into ...
The "3 Rs" in science refer to Reduction, Replacement, and Refinement. These principles aim to minimize the use of animals in research by promoting alternatives to animal testing (Replacement), reducing the number of animals used (Reduction), and improving experimental techniques to enhance animal welfare and data quality (Refinement). Collectively, they encourage ethical practices in scientific research involving animals.
Research paper or a report.
Zoologists often use a variety of tools in their research, including binoculars for observation, camera traps for remote monitoring, GPS devices for tracking animals, microscope for studying specimens, and data analysis software for processing research findings. Additionally, they may use field guides, tagging equipment, and radio telemetry to study animal behavior and populations.
You should use research and investigation to solve that problem.The scientist used research and investigation to perform her experiment. Research and investigation are the foundations of science.
If the information collected is nominative - eg what is your favourite colour - you have no choice but to use mode. A median may be an appropriate choice is there are outliers or if the data are on an ordinal but not in interval scale - eg small/medium/large or strongly disagree/disagree/agree/strongly agree.
You can use the preposition "with" with the verb "disagree." For example, "I disagree with your opinion."
The answer depends on the type of qualitative data.You would use your taste buds as tools to distinguish between sweet, sour, salt and so on.You could use you sight to determine the colour of eyes, hair or cars.You would use your own judgement to choose between "strongly agree", "agree", "disagree" or "strongly disagree".
No reason... i disagree with the answer above. it is not good to use wikipedia as your only research page because wikipedia can be edited by anyone! so they can just make up an answer, or even put what they think, which might not be accurate
I would disagree with that last statement.
yes it does use animal testing because it is medicine.
To agree or disagree by a given sign is known as "nonverbal communication" or "sign language," where individuals use gestures, symbols, or signals to express their agreement or disagreement without spoken words. This can encompass a variety of forms, including body language, facial expressions, or specific signs in formal sign languages. Such methods allow for effective communication in situations where verbal language may not be feasible or appropriate.
i am agreed or i agree
Kevin Engler has written: 'Salmonellosis in laboratory animals' -- subject(s): Bibliography, Salmonella infections, Laboratory animals 'Animal-related computer simulation programs for use in education and research' -- subject(s): Computer simulation, Bibliography, Humane education, Animal models in research 'Alternatives to the use of animals in research and education' -- subject(s): Animals, Bibliography, Research
It's not so much that they didn't agree. It's more that they both were working to make nuclear weapons and they were both trying to become world powers through the use of nuclear weapons.
The research of plant and animal organisms. Includes the use of microscopes, dissecting animal organs and the way certain aspects of the environment affect the surrounding life.
== == You can clean the cage with a diluted bleach and water solution. I use baking soda and vinegar, because it's safer for the rabbit.