No. Only black holes have event horizons.
A black hole has an event horizon, beyond which nothing can escape, including light. Neutron stars also have an event horizon, called the "surface" or "crust," which marks the boundary within which matter is crushed by extreme gravity. White dwarfs, being less massive, do not have an event horizon.
No. An event horizon is an area where even light cant escape so only black holes have it
The event horizon is not related to density comparison with the atomic nucleus. It is the point around a black hole where the escape velocity is equal to the speed of light, and nothing, not even light, can escape. The density of a black hole is concentrated in its singularity at the center, not at the event horizon.
Yes, the first neutron star was observed in a supernova remnant. The object, named PSR B1919+21, was discovered in 1967 in the Crab Nebula, the remnant of a supernova that exploded in the year 1054 AD.
A neutron star is a stellar remnant
No, they do not.
A black hole has an event horizon, beyond which nothing can escape, including light. Neutron stars also have an event horizon, called the "surface" or "crust," which marks the boundary within which matter is crushed by extreme gravity. White dwarfs, being less massive, do not have an event horizon.
A black hole has more mass than a neutron star, but if you are comparing volume it would depend on the mass of the black hole. A neutron star is estimated to be about 14 miles in diameter, which is larger than the event horizon of a black hole up to about 3.8 times the mass of the sun. A more massive black hole will be larger.
If you mean a giant star, no.
No. An event horizon is an area where even light cant escape so only black holes have it
That refers to a black hole - but a black hole is not exactly a star.
The event horizon is not related to density comparison with the atomic nucleus. It is the point around a black hole where the escape velocity is equal to the speed of light, and nothing, not even light, can escape. The density of a black hole is concentrated in its singularity at the center, not at the event horizon.
It would all depend on how close the neutron star was. If it was outside the event horizon, then if would be observed to be orbiting "nothing". If it strayed too close to the black hole, then it would be slowly ripped apart, until a slightly larger black hole was all that is left.
It all relates to what you define as big. A black hole is an infinite region in space with an infinite density. It's "event horizon" is not infinite. If you wish to categorise between size of a neutron star and a black hole's "event horizon", then a black hole is, in most cases larger - but there are micro black holes, which exhibit all the characteristics of a black hole but have a much smaller "event horizon". In the physical sense, everything is bigger than a black hole, but in a terminological sense (the event horizon) it would depend on the mass of the black hole.
A black hole is a single point where all matter from an extremely massive neutron star has condensed to a point of infinite density, called a singularity. The immense gravitational pull of a black hole is so strong that not even light can escape its event horizon, the point of no return.
The extreme gravitational field of the neutron star...an object with typically 4 to 8 times the mass of our sun, packed into a diameter of about eight miles...pulls mass off of any close companion star, which spirals into the neutron star. If the companion star is close enough, it may over time totally disintegrate and be consumed by the neutron star, which itself may become massive enough to finally become a stellar "black hole", an object whose surface escape velocity would be greater than the speed of light, so that nothing, not even light, can escape beyond its "event horizon".
Good sentence for neutron star - WOW ! see that;s a neutron star !!