No. Co-generation just increases the overall efficiency.
In normal central heating systems a large quantity of heat is lost in the exhaust gas. The flame heats an exchanger which warms the air circulating through the furnace.
In a co-generating plant the flame heats a sink on a thermal-electric device (usually a sterling driven generator). The "cold" side of the device is then cooled by the air circulating through the device.
"Unavailable for doing work" is related to the Second Law of Thermodynamics.
Second Law of Thermodynamics
No biological entity violates any of the laws of thermodynamics.
The second law of thermodynamics would be violated in situations where heat spontaneously flows from a colder object to a hotter one without any external work being done, as this contradicts the natural direction of heat transfer. Additionally, a perpetual motion machine of the second kind, which could convert thermal energy completely into mechanical work without any energy loss, would also violate this law. In essence, any scenario that suggests entropy could decrease in a closed system or that energy could be perfectly converted without loss would breach the second law.
The Second Law of Thermodynamics.
If you are suggesting a "perpetual motion" scenerio, it would violate the first or second laws of thermodynamics. Many inventors dream of perpetual motion machines, but they are an impossible dream according to the laws of thermodynamics. The second law of thermodynamics says that an engine or process of any type must always have an efficiency of less than 100%. A perpetual motion machine that uses a generator to power the motor that runs the generator requires both the generator and motor to operate with 100% efficiency. This type of perpetual motion machine does not violate the first law of thermodynamics, but violates the second law of thermodynamics. It is a perpetual motion machine of the second kind because it violates the second law of thermodynamics. Not even the cleverest engineer or inventor can build a perpetual motion machine because it would violate either the first or second law of thermodynamics, which are fundamental laws of physics.
Quite simply, that would violate the First Law of Thermodynamics, or the Second Law of Thermodynamics. The pressure difference is caused by the weight of the water above it, and it is an equilibrium situation.
Yes. It has to be so, since it would otherwise be possible to violate the Second Law of Thermodynamics!
"Unavailable for doing work" is related to the Second Law of Thermodynamics.
second law
Second Law of Thermodynamics
No biological entity violates any of the laws of thermodynamics.
It is the idea of a machine continuously producing energy, without energy input - or producing more energy than what is put into the machine. This would violate the First Law of Thermodynamics (conservation of energy), and in general, it is not believed to be possible. No process is known which violates the conservation of energy. (A "perpetual motion machine of the second kind" would violate the Second Law of Thermodynamics; this is generally believed to be impossible, too.)
The fact that usable energy is always lost in an energy transfer is due to the second law of thermodynamics. This law states that entropy, or disorder, tends to increase over time in a closed system, leading to the loss of usable energy in the form of heat.
True
There is no commonly accepted law by that name, as far as I know. Two important laws about energy are the First Law of Thermodynamics and the Second Law of Thermodynamics.
According to the second law of Thermodynamics, the amount of usable energy will continuously decrease.According to the second law of Thermodynamics, the amount of usable energy will continuously decrease.According to the second law of Thermodynamics, the amount of usable energy will continuously decrease.According to the second law of Thermodynamics, the amount of usable energy will continuously decrease.