Yes, it does. Higher density means being more dense than something else. In that light, that makes it a relative or comparitive term. But you are correct. Higher density means something is more dense than something else.
To convert volume to weight, you need to know the density of the substance in question. The formula is Weight = Volume x Density. First, find the density of the material, then multiply it by the volume to get the weight.
Weight = (density) times (volume)The definition of density is mass/volume .Now [ weight = mass x gravity ], so [ mass = weight/gravity ], and [ density = weight/gravity x volume ] .So Weight = (density) x (volume) x (gravity)
To calculate the volume of a compound when given its molecular weight and weight, you need to first convert the weight to moles using the molecular weight. Then, you can use the density of the compound to find the volume by dividing the weight in moles by the density. The formula is volume = weight (in moles) / density.
Hmmm... technically false. Density is mass/volume - it is an intrinsic property. Weight is subjective to the force of gravity, while density is not.
When density and volume are given, the formula for density can be used to determine the mass of the object. density = mass / volume mass = density * volume Assuming the object is on Earth, it can be assumed that g=9.80 N/kg. w= mg, or weight = mass * gravitational constant (of Earth) purely algebraically, weight = density * volume * gravitational constant.
You cannot equate weight and volume without having the density or concentration
cannot equate weight and volume without the density of liquid or the concentration
It depends on the density of the substance, there is no way to equate weight (lbs) and volume (gallons) except by knowing the density of the substance concerned.
You can not equate mg (weight) with ml (volume) without specifying the density of the substance being measured.
You cannot equate weight and length without knowing the density, shape and possibly other dimensions
"oz" is a measure of weight/mass, "mls" is a measure of volume, you can not equate the two without knowing the density of the 650mls of the substance being measured.
Yes, Archimedes' principle states that the buoyant force on an object is equal to the weight of the fluid it displaces, not the density. The buoyant force is equal to the weight of the fluid displaced by the object.
You can not equate units of volume and weight directly.
A "quart" is a measure of volume. You can not equate a volume with a weight unless you know the density of the material. Apples are not of uniform density and there will be gaps between the apple slices. Therefore we can not give you a precise answer on the information presented in your question.
You cannot equate weight directly with length. You need to know the shape and dimensions to find the volume. You then need to know the density and apply it. You also have to convert units after that.
You cannot equate mass and volume without knowing the density. Remember, density is mass/volume
You can not equate grams and teaspoons without also knowing the density.