By definition, a centripetal force is a force towards a central point, exerted on an
object following a curved path. It causes an object to follow a curved path, such
as an orbit; this is what the gravitational force of the sun does to planets. So it
is clearly a centripetal force.
A centrifugal force is defined as a force that is exerted away from a center
around which an object either rotates or revolves. Literally, in terms of etymology,
centrifugal means fleeing the center. Planets orbit the sun because of a balance
of centripetal and centrifugal forces. If there were only an attractive force pulling
a planet toward the sun, the planet would fall into the sun. And if there were only
a centrifugal force pulling planets away from the sun, the planets would fly out of
the solar system and into interstellar space. But since these two forces are balanced,
planets remain in orbit around the sun.
An object on which the forces are balanced travels in a straight line at constant
speed. The planets do not travel in straight lines or at constant speeds, because
the forces on them are not balanced. The only force on a planet is the centripetal
force of gravitational attraction between it and the sun. That single force produces
all of the orbits we observe, whether elliptical (repeating) or hyperbolic (not repeating).
Those orbits are fairly easy to derive using Newton's formula for gravitational force
and direction, plus some geometry and some calculus.
Non-furious comments: I avoid writing "centrifugal force", by writing "centrifugal effect".
I think that's more or less OK, depending on your "audience".
Technically "centrifugal force" is called a "fictitious force".
It is actually correct to use it in a rotating frame of reference.
Unfortunately, it is often used incorrectly, even by educators.
Luckily, the answer to the question was "centripetal force".
<<>> The physical processes are that there is a force of gravity pulling the Sun and Earth towards each other. The force acts equally both ways, producing an acceleration in both objects, towards each other, following Netwon's second law: force equals mass times acceleration. The Sun's much greater mass means that its acceleration is small, while the Earth's acceleration towards the Sun keeps it in its elliptical orbit. That is what's happening, so for those who can't remember the difference between centrifugal and centripetal, don't worry, they are not terms used by astronomers.
A satellite remains in orbit due to the gravitational force exerted by the Earth, which pulls it towards the planet. As the satellite moves forward at a high velocity, this gravitational pull acts as a centripetal force, continuously changing the direction of the satellite's motion and keeping it in a curved path around the Earth. The balance between this gravitational attraction and the satellite's inertia, which tries to move it in a straight line, results in a stable orbit. If the satellite's speed is too low, it will fall back to Earth, while too high a speed will cause it to escape orbit.
Newton's first law states that an object in motion will remain in motion unless acted upon by an external force. In the case of an object moving in a circular path, centripetal force is required to keep the object moving in that path, not centrifugal force. Centrifugal force is a perceived force that arises from the object's inertia, rather than a true force acting on the object itself.
hahhahahaha lol i have that sheet too, i don't know if it's right (i doubt it is lol) but I put 'the earth has a great gravational force pulling everything in this means that the earth can't be in the middle because of the gravity elsewhere... lol if you know anything better as an answer, tell me plz, lol ;)
Newton's laws of motion describe how objects move in response to external forces, while planetary motion refers to the motion of planets in space under the influence of gravitational forces. Newton's law of universal gravitation helps explain the motion of planets in their orbits around the sun by describing the gravitational attraction between celestial bodies.
The regular orbiting of one object around another, such as a planet around the Sun, is governed by gravitational forces. The planet follows an elliptical path, maintaining a balance between its inertia (which tends to move it in a straight line) and the gravitational pull of the Sun. This motion is described by Kepler's laws of planetary motion, which explain the relationship between the orbital period and the distance from the Sun. Essentially, the gravitational attraction keeps the planet in a stable orbit, allowing for predictable patterns in its movement.
Centrifugal forces at present do not exist in nature. However, the opposite of centrifugal forces, centripetal forces, do exist. Centrifugal forces are used only to explain that centripetal forces need an opposite force to act against it.
No, centripetal and centrifugal forces are not action-reaction pairs. Centripetal force acts towards the center of a circular path, keeping an object in uniform circular motion, while centrifugal force is a fictitious force that appears to act outward on the object. They arise due to the inertia of the object in motion and the frame of reference chosen.
Centripetal ("towards the center") force is a real force, that pulls something towards the center during a circular movement. Centrifugal ("center-fleeing") force is a ficticious force, required to explain the observed reactions in a rotating frame of reference.
Yes. Sort of. If you consider the rotating system from the point of view of somebody OUTSIDE the system (not participating in the rotation), no "centrifugal force" is required to explain anything; there is an unbalanced centripetal (center-seeking) force, which accelerates whatever rotates, toward the center.
Centrifugal force is a fictitious force that appears to act on objects moving in a circular path. In physics, it is used to explain the outward force experienced by objects in rotation, counteracting centripetal force. This force is important in understanding the dynamics of rotating systems, such as planets orbiting the sun or objects on a spinning carousel.
If the distance between the star and planet were 3 times greater, the gravitational attraction between them would be inversely proportional to the square of the new distance. This means the gravitational force would be 1/9th of what it was originally. Gravity follows an inverse square law, so as the distance increases, the gravitational force decreases rapidly.
The spin cycle in a washing machine serves to remove excess water from the clothes through centrifugal force. During this cycle, the drum spins rapidly, creating a centripetal force that pushes the water outwards. This centrifugal force accelerates the water towards the drum's edges, allowing it to be drained out efficiently.
centrifugal force
Newton's first law states that an object in motion will remain in motion unless acted upon by an external force. In the case of an object moving in a circular path, centripetal force is required to keep the object moving in that path, not centrifugal force. Centrifugal force is a perceived force that arises from the object's inertia, rather than a true force acting on the object itself.
From the point of view of an outside observer, no centrifugal force is necessary to "explain" anything; the natural tendency of an object is to go ahead in a straight line. A centripetal force is required to keep an object moving in a circle; no counterforce is required to "balance" things, since the object is in fact accelerating. The centrifugal force is introduced for the rotating frame of reference - i.e., from the point of view of somebody who is participating in the rotational movement.
One big reason is because centrifugal force doesn't explain circular motion, and the other one is because centrifugal force doesn't even exist. I can't think of a way to make an object move in a circle by pulling it from outside of the circle.
Gravitational force is a consequence of an object having mass being attracted to all other sources of mass in the universe.Distance affects strength of attraction.