This is a question that is not agreed upon in the English-speaking community. It is used, but some people think incorrectly. Some dictionaries list it as an obsolete form, replaced by "connote." However, other dictionaries list it as a regular entry, and many people use it. So the debate is whether usage trumps tradition, as with many other words. In any case, the word is alive and well, and used often, whether or not it is used incorrectly.
_____
The ultimate authority on English usage is the Oxford English Dictionary ("OED"), and in the USA another popular authority is Webster's. Neither has an entry for "*connotate" but both have an entry for "connote":
The incorrect form "*connotate" probably derives from back-formation from the noun "connotation."
the word science belong to Greek language.
The word "machine" is derived from the Latin word "machina," which in turn comes from the Greek word "mēkhanē," meaning "contrivance" or "device."
No, "renderingly" is not a recognized word in the English language.
The word for earth in Kirundi is "igihugu."
No, "solentific" is not a recognized word in the English language.
No, the word "celestation" does not exist in the English language. Perhaps you are looking for another word or term?
no.
This word does not exist in the English language!
The word babecue does not exist in the English language.
No, "jandra" is not a French word. It does not exist in the French language.
The word "diagably" does not exist in the English language.
The modern word coral is derived from the Greek language word korrallion.
'choie' does not exist as a word in English language.
Negative. Themary does not exist in the English language. Perhaps you misspelled it?
There is no such language as "Jewish" and no such word as "musial". You are probably thinking about the Yiddish language or the Hebrew language, but the word "musial" doesn't exist in either one.
The word "litatute" does not exist in the English language
As far as I know, that word does not exist in the English language.