Because the scientific method means thinking of a hypothesis and proving a cause and effect in nature. If there is no control, then you can not prove the hypothesis of the cause and effect because you can not prove that your experiment caused the effect. If you have a theory that pepsi causes grass to grow, and with no control you manage to show that your lawn grew grass, how could you ever say that it was the pepsi that caused the growth unless your next door neighboors's yard died during the same time?
To help you conclude that no uncontrolled factors significantly influenced your results. To help you determine that your experimental results are valid To help control for factors that aren't being tested but might affect results
to represent the population.at random. -apex (;
In an experiment, a control serves as a baseline for comparison, allowing researchers to determine the effect of the independent variable on the dependent variable. By maintaining all conditions the same except for the variable being tested, the control helps identify any changes that can be attributed directly to the experiment. This ensures that the results are valid and reliable, minimizing the influence of external factors. Ultimately, the control enhances the overall integrity of the experimental findings.
To be considered valid, the results of a scientific experiment must be reliable and reproducible, meaning that they can be consistently obtained under the same conditions. Additionally, the experiment should be designed to control for variables that could influence the outcome, ensuring that any observed effects can be attributed to the factors being tested. Clear documentation of the methodology and data is also essential for peer review and verification by other researchers.
The word is "methodology." It refers to the systematic approach or procedure followed in conducting an experiment to achieve reliable and valid results.
A control is needed in a valid experiment because without controls then more then one variable is being tested. This can mess up the results.
For an experiment to be valid, it needs a control group to compare results, random assignment of participants to groups to minimize bias, manipulation of an independent variable to observe its effect, and reliable measures to accurately record outcomes.
To comare and contrast the differences and similarites.Im not really sure if this is right becuz i had the same question so ill see th votes in a few.Well wish me and u good luck cuz for me its due on monday
a control group and statistical analysys of the resultsalso, to be considered valid, the results of a scientific experiment must be repeatable and still proven correct.
The necessary compounds depend on the specific experiment being conducted. However, common compounds include reagents for reactions, solvents for dissolving substances, standards for calibration, and control substances for comparison. It is essential to carefully select and prepare these compounds to ensure accurate and reproducible results in the experiment.
A valid experiment is characterized by a clear hypothesis, a control group for comparison, random assignment of participants, and the ability to replicate the results. It should also have ethical considerations and controls in place to minimize bias and confounding variables.
To help you conclude that no uncontrolled factors significantly influenced your results. To help you determine that your experimental results are valid To help control for factors that aren't being tested but might affect results
To make an experiment more valid, ensure that the sample size is representative of the population, use random assignment to assign participants to groups, and control for any confounding variables that could impact the results.
to represent the population.at random. -apex (;
To ensure an experiment is valid, start by clearly defining your hypothesis and the variables involved. Control for extraneous variables by keeping conditions consistent and using a suitable sample size. Implement appropriate controls, such as a control group, to compare results. Finally, repeat the experiment multiple times to confirm findings and reduce the likelihood of anomalies.
I.What types of plants were used in the experiment?II.What was the experiment's control? III.Was the experiment repeated more than once?
Draw a valid conclusion for that experiment.