Yes, there have been instances throughout history where groups of people have gained freedom through revolutions, uprisings, or wars, only to later lose it due to internal divisions, corruption, lack of unity, or apathy. Examples include the French Revolution leading to the rise of Napoleon, the Russian Revolution resulting in the establishment of a totalitarian regime, and several post-colonial African nations struggling with political instability and authoritarianism after gaining independence.
The European traders and merchants gained the most from the Triangle Trade as they profited immensely from the trade of African slaves, raw materials, and manufactured goods. The African people who were enslaved and forcibly transported to the Americas suffered the most significant losses, experiencing exploitation, violence, and loss of freedom and culture.
During the Freedom Rides, no individuals on the buses died as a direct result of the violence they faced. However, several Freedom Riders were injured and faced severe violence from white mobs, leading to significant injuries.
People think environmental changes will restrict personal freedom
This trait is often described as nonchalance or indifference. It typically involves maintaining a sense of composure and detachment in various situations, giving the impression that one is unfazed or unconcerned. People who exhibit this trait may appear relaxed and unaffected by external events.
All people deserve good life time and business loans or just financial loan can make it better. Just because people's freedom is grounded on money.
It was the American people who gained freedom of speech and freedom of the press. These two rights, among many others, are found in the Bill of Rights of the U.S. Constitution.
In the bill of rights we gained "The Freedom of Assembly" which in turn allows freedom for protests, picketing and demonstrations.
President Barack Obama is a good reason to say yes.
Indifference
Sudan became independent in 1956. The Sudanese people are still ruled by a dictatorship, though, so they are not truly free.
The slaves. Slavery was abolished throughout the USA in 1865.
Equiano gained his freedom by purchasing it from his master. Once free, he became an advocate for the abolition of the slave trade, published his autobiography, "The Interesting Narrative of the Life of Olaudah Equiano," and became involved in the British abolitionist movement.
they are called 'bystanders'.
After she gained her freedom she went back and escorted 300 people on the Underground Railroad out of slavery.
The answer is no, they didn't expand freedom, they didn't reduce freedom, and they didn't leave freedom unchanged. Freedom isn't something that one can sum like poker chips. Some of what they United States did increased somefreedoms for some people. Other things decreased somefreedoms for some people. Now, one thing to note is that, since freedom cannot be treated as an arithmetic quantity, there is no justification to be found in a claim that morefreedom was gained than was lost. Such a claim is gibberish (as is a claim that less freedom was gained than was lost). So evaluation of policy must be on some other basis.
Black slaves, commonly referred to as N1ggers back then.Now they are known as African Americans.
The overthrow of the Ming Dynasty allowed for an upheaval in the economic system. The people gained back some of their land and had more freedom.