Archaea differ from bacteria in their genetic makeup, cell membrane composition, and metabolic pathways. Archaea have a different cell wall structure, lack peptidoglycan, and have unique DNA replication and transcription systems. They are often found in extreme environments and are more closely related to eukaryotes than to bacteria.
You can distinguish between Eubacteria and Archaebacteria by examining the composition of their cell walls. Eubacteria have peptidoglycan in their cell walls, while Archaebacteria lack peptidoglycan and have unique cell wall structures. The presence or absence of peptidoglycan can provide clues to the classification of a prokaryotic organism carrying out photosynthesis.
Kingdom Monera
Archaea bacteria is a sort of misnomer. They are two different domains. Archaea are prokaryotes, but are actually much different than eubacteria. They are not true bacteria. However eubacteria are true bacteria meaning they have a peptidoglycan cell wall. However they are both prokaryotes. The third domain are eukarya which are eukaryotes.
They have different types of cell walls and cell membranes.
Eubacteria and archaebacteria are prokaryotic organisms, while organisms in other kingdoms are eukaryotic. Eubacteria have a peptidoglycan cell wall, while archaebacteria have a different type of cell wall. Archaebacteria live in extreme environments, while eubacteria are found in a wide range of habitats.
the archea has 5 nucleus and the eubacteria only have 3..... visit the comparision website for a better answer....
No, archaebacteria and eubacteria are not considered protists. They are both types of bacteria that are classified in different domains (Archaea and Bacteria), separate from the domain Eukarya where protists are found.
After the discovery of archaebacteria, it was decided that archaebacteria and eubacteria have too many different characteristics that they need their own domains.
Eubacteria can be grouped based on their shape: cocci (spherical), bacilli (rod-shaped), and spirilla (spiral-shaped). This classification helps distinguish different types of eubacteria based on their physical characteristics.
Eubacteria typically have flagella for mobility, while archaebacteria do not. Additionally, eubacteria may have pili for attachment and movement on surfaces, which are less common in archaebacteria. Overall, eubacteria tend to have more diverse mechanisms for mobility compared to archaebacteria.
No, eubacteria are prokaryotes.
They have different types of cell walls and cell membranes.
Archaea and eubacteria are most different in terms of their cell membrane structure, as archaea have unique membrane lipids, and their genetic machinery, which is more similar to eukaryotes than bacteria. These differences reflect distinct evolutionary lineages and adaptations to different environments.
You can distinguish between Eubacteria and Archaebacteria by examining the composition of their cell walls. Eubacteria have peptidoglycan in their cell walls, while Archaebacteria lack peptidoglycan and have unique cell wall structures. The presence or absence of peptidoglycan can provide clues to the classification of a prokaryotic organism carrying out photosynthesis.
what are some kinds of eubacteria
Eubacteria is a prokaryote.
Nope and archeabacteria doesn't either.No, the cells of a Eubacteria do not have a nucleus.