0
Actually, it wasn't the Doppler-effect that lead to the Big Bang theory, but the red-shift of remote galaxies. Although it was initially thought that this red-shift might be caused by a Doppler-effect, it is now understood that this red-shift is caused by the metric expansion of space itself.
What else can I help you with?
How did Einstein's Theory of Relativity lead to the development of the Big Bang Theory?
In 1924, Alexander Friedman noted that the equations of general relativity have only two solutions: an expanding universe or a contracting universe. Independently of that work, in 1927 Georges LeMaitre used those same equations to show that an expanding universe was the only reasonable description of our Universe. His ideas were later described as a "big bang" by those who opposed them.
If the Big Bang theory ever is disproved would the estimates on the size and age of the universe still hold true?
Ummmm..............Me thinks the "BigBang" has already been changed to the "Big Expansion". Where the Universe is Infinite, has always been and will always be........just fluctuating as the "Branes" in the 11th dimension fluctuate. See these links: www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/elegant/program.html http://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/gr/public/qg_ss.html http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superstring_theory Then there is the Infinite Fractal Universe See this link: http://www.stanford.edu/%7Ealinde/1032226.pdf In any account, the Universe is VVVVEEERRRRYYYY old indeed. We know that the Earth is some 4.5 billion years old and the sun some 4.7 to 5 billion years old and our solar system is very young in comparison to the rest of the Universe so the approximately 13.7 Billion years that is attributed to it is probably pretty close in any Theory. TommyTrouble ;-) To build off of Tommy, If the Big Bang theory is disproven, the estimates about the size and age of the universe will need adjusting. They are currently based off of the same ideas and models that make up Big Bang theory. How much they will need adjusting is the question, and that has no answer. It depends on whether the theory is dis-proven in it's entirety (like aether theory of light, or phlogiston theory of heat), or if it's just shown to be limited and inadequate, like Newton's theory of mechanics. If it's the former, large adjustments may be necessary. If the latter, small ones, as the theory isn't wrong, it just isn't complete.
Who is the main vocalist in big bang?
I think Daesung is. Taeyang is the lead vocalist (gets more part) and Daesung is the main vocalist (gets more high notes & adlib).
What is the difference between oscillating universe to big bang theory?
The Big Bang Theory holds that our present Universe was, about thirteen billion years ago, in an extremely more dense state and has been expanding from that ever since. A sub-set of that theory is that our Universe has gone through an infinite series of expansions: each of which lead to a gravitationally induced end to the expansion, then a collapse of the Universe into a state of extreme density, and then another expansion. This is called the "Oscillating Universe" Hypothesis The latest observations make the latter idea very unlikely, as our present Universe will almost certainly never cease its expansion. Either we are in the first oscillation of the Universe that failed to stop its expansion, or there were no oscillations prior to this one at all. Unless later observations show that our present conclusions are wrong, there will no oscillations after this Universe. It is difficult to imagine how we could ever determine if our Universe was the first oscillation that failed to end its expansion or if there were simply no oscillations prior to this expansion at all.
How did the theory of biogenesis lead the way for germ theory of disease?
The theory of biogenesis established that living organisms arise from preexisting living organisms. This laid the foundation for the germ theory of disease by challenging the widespread belief in spontaneous generation of life forms and highlighting the role of microorganisms, or germs, in causing infectious diseases. The understanding that germs can be transferred from one organism to another through various means was pivotal in the development of the germ theory of disease.
Does the Doppler effect only apply to sound waves?
No
What are the advantage and disadvantage of Doppler effect?
Advantage: Doppler effect is used in various fields such as radar technology and astronomy to measure the velocity of objects. In medical imaging, it helps in diagnosing conditions like cardiovascular diseases. Disadvantage: Doppler effect can be influenced by external factors such as background noise or interference, which may lead to inaccuracies in measurements. Additionally, it may be challenging to isolate the desired signal from the background noise in certain applications.
Who is the director of the T.V. show called the big bang theory?
The Big Bang Theory has two executive producers and they are Chuck Lorre as well as Bill Brady. These two men also created this television show. Lee Aronsohm and Steve Molaro are the lead writers.
Who was the lead actress in the movie Hop?
Kaley Cuoco plays 'Sam O'Hare'. She also stars in the CBS televison series "The Big Bang Theory".
Why do people say the big bang is just a lie of how humans were created?
Because the Big bang theory is a lie. People cant come to terms with the fact they are not the supreme being in the universe, so they attempt to hide the fact of intelligent design with a factless theory which people believe without question. Just a small amount of research will lead you to the truth, Big bang is a lie, and most of Americans have fallen for it.
Who played the lead in chity chity bang bang the movie?
Dick Van Dyke
Who is the lead singer of big bang?
Tae yang
Does Zack kressaty lead guitar player in bang have a sister?
no he does not.
How did Einstein's Theory of Relativity lead to the development of the Big Bang Theory?
In 1924, Alexander Friedman noted that the equations of general relativity have only two solutions: an expanding universe or a contracting universe. Independently of that work, in 1927 Georges LeMaitre used those same equations to show that an expanding universe was the only reasonable description of our Universe. His ideas were later described as a "big bang" by those who opposed them.
What lead to big bang?
too much stuff in tiny space
What is logical explanation for acceleration in expansion rate of the universe?
* The Doppler Effect provides evidence that the universe is expanding. However, the redshift observed may be due to light climbing out of a gravity well (a star). Bigger stars can been seen from further away. Bigger stars have a greater redshift (due to size of the greater gravity well). So maybe the Universe doesn't expand as we were lead to believe? Or maybe it does.
Big Bang does not provide a theory of cosmic origins. It delineates cosmic evolution from a split second. It says nothing about time zero so BANG is left out. Do you have any theory of cosmic origin?
The Big Bang is the best theory we have, it is supported by abundant evidence, and is the closest we can get to the Univere's origin. The cause of the Big Bang is only speculation and may never be fully known, but that does not mean the Big Bang itself didn't happen. Some people put God as the cause, but that's not the only explanation. Whenever someone says the Big Bang is "just a theory" they are proving that they are ignorant because they don't know the definition of a scientific theory. In science a theory is far from a guess, conjecture, or speculation; it is simply an explanation backed by sufficient evidence.AnswerThe big bang does not provide a theory of cosmic origins. The big bang is just a theory. I am a Christian so you can jest all you want, but the big bang is pretty much as possible as my God creating it because EVERY THING FROM SPACE TIME TO ASTRONOMY TO THE END OF TIME came from NOTHING AT ALL and it is possible that the universe came out of something that did not exist. I know that part of the theory is that the universe came out of a molecular explosion, but where did the molecules come from? If they were not there, as for the cosmic origin scientists will tell you that they came from clouds called nursery clouds, cosmic nursery clouds actually, and that the cosmos came from those nursery clouds. I believe that God made the cosmos. The cosmic origin could not have come from the big bang because it is as plausible as God being real to scientists. AnswerGod is my theory of cosmic origin. I am a Christian believer in God and the truth of the Bible. I also have no difficulty consolidating my belief in God with an acceptance of scientific explanations for the origin of the cosmos. I agree with the Big Bang theory as well as the theory of evolution by natural selection for living organisms on Earth. But I believe it all had to begin somehow, with something, before there was anything. It began with the First Cause of all things, God. I also highly recommend the book entitled "The Language of God" written by Francis Collins, who oversaw the Human Genome Project for several years.AnswerSearch for materials on the newly emerging Membrane Theory. There are aspects of the theory that are extremely interesting and that allow physicists [theoretically] to go through and past the Big Bang, to meaningfully speculate about conditions existing prior to the Big Bang, and to explore some possibilities about what caused the Big Bang. I think this model harmonizes reasonably well with some faith-based approaches. Big Bang was coined as a term of derision toward those who first advocated the theory that everything was, at some time in the distant past, all in one place. There could have been no actual bang, because there was no medium through which sound could propagate. The Big Bang theory is indeed a theory of cosmic origin. There is no requirement that every theory be a 'theory of everything', or that the theory itself contain the answer to every imaginable question that it might inspire. A theory should account for current observations, it should be possible to test or search for evidence that supports the theory or that refutesit. And the theory should, as the questioner demonstrates, lead to further questions.Philosophers of science can argue powerfully that no theory can actually be proven; this makes scientific work all the more tantalizing. The strength of the best theories is not that they provide clear, detailed and complete answers that are beyond challenge. The crumbling of theories in the light of new knowledge is a wonderful thing, even if not for the persons who devoted their careers to the crumbling theories. "The strength of theories is that they turn Mysteries into Problems." This statement is a paraphrase from: How We Make Decisions; Read Montague, Plume, 2006.
