by rain!
Katrina was considerably worse
they are the same because they both have to do with water troubling an area
by the floods or by to much water
One positive effect of floods in floodplains is that they can replenish nutrients in the soil by depositing sediment, which can enrich the land and support plant growth. Additionally, floodwaters can create diverse habitats for a variety of aquatic and terrestrial species, contributing to overall ecosystem biodiversity.
Meteorologists classify floods based on their cause, such as heavy rainfall, snowmelt, or dam failure. They also categorize floods by their severity, which can range from minor to major to catastrophic. Additionally, floods can be classified by the area they affect, such as urban flooding or river flooding.
Floods can destroy their homes, environment, and food.
Deep
its stupid
in Carpatho-Ukraine
is 30,000
The difference(s) between floods in the UK and Bangladesh are in Bangladesh, the dirty and clean water mixes together and contributes to the formation of diseases in the water. This also happens in the UK; however, the UK can afford to buy clean water for drinking in these cases.
killing them and that shizzle
houses are destroyed
No. Floods usuually only occur in well documented areas.
The UK has drains and the also have sewers where the flooding water may be maintained. They also have this flooding controlled agency which gets money form the government to help the UK in the time of the floods.
the uk floods were caused by heavy rain and the river banks burst and the pakistan floods were caused by monsoon rain
if the flood is strong enough it can