Tectonics is the large scale processes effecting the crust. The large scale process that is accepted to be occurring is plate tectonics (crust separated into plates that move and interact). The theory of continental drift suggested that continents moved however it never proposed a mechanism, plate tectonics is that mechanism that explains what alfred wegener saw. So back to your question similarities between what i think you mean modern tectonics i.e. plate tectonics and continental drift is that they both suggest the crust is moving.
The theory that explains how rocks in the earth store energy and release it to cause earthquakes is called the elastic rebound theory. This theory states that rocks deform elastically as stress accumulates within them. When the stress exceeds the rocks' strength, they suddenly break or "rebound," releasing the stored energy in the form of seismic waves, resulting in an earthquake.
The theory that was confirmed by age evidence and magnetic clues is the theory of plate tectonics. Evidence such as the ages of rocks on either side of ocean ridges and the alignment of magnetic minerals in oceanic crust support the idea that Earth's lithosphere is broken into rigid plates that move and interact with each other.
Probably, earthquakes or volcanic activity. Or the movement of plate tectonics.
No they are not the same thing. Plate Tectonics is the study of mechanisms and the results of large-scale movement of the earth's crust. Tectonic Plates are large sections of the earth's crust that float on top of semi-molten rocks of the upper mantle.
Paleomagnetism provided strong evidence for plate tectonics, as it revealed that Earth's magnetic field has reversed multiple times throughout history. By studying magnetic minerals in rocks, scientists were able to track the movement of continents and support the theory of plate tectonics.
Magnetic reversals in Earth's history help support the theory of plate tectonics by providing evidence of seafloor spreading and the movement of lithospheric plates. They also assist in dating rocks and determining the age of oceanic crust.
Earth's magnetic pole reversals are recorded in rocks as they cool and solidify. When rocks form, they preserve the orientation of Earth's magnetic field at that time. By studying the magnetic alignment of rocks on the ocean floor, scientists have discovered patterns that support the theory of plate tectonics, such as the symmetrical magnetic striping on either side of mid-ocean ridges.
Plate Tectonics
plate tectonics, which explains the movement of Earth's outer shell. Fossil remains on separate continents that were once part of the same landmass suggest that continents were once connected and have since drifted apart. The shape of continents also fits together like a puzzle, supporting the idea of continental drift and plate tectonics.
Tectonics is the large scale processes effecting the crust. The large scale process that is accepted to be occurring is plate tectonics (crust separated into plates that move and interact). The theory of continental drift suggested that continents moved however it never proposed a mechanism, plate tectonics is that mechanism that explains what alfred wegener saw. So back to your question similarities between what i think you mean modern tectonics i.e. plate tectonics and continental drift is that they both suggest the crust is moving.
The theory that explains how rocks in the earth store energy and release it to cause earthquakes is called the elastic rebound theory. This theory states that rocks deform elastically as stress accumulates within them. When the stress exceeds the rocks' strength, they suddenly break or "rebound," releasing the stored energy in the form of seismic waves, resulting in an earthquake.
Rocks lock in their magnetism when they cool.
I can't find it in my packet either.
* Identical fossils of a small reptile have been found in Africa and Soth America * Mountains in Europe and the USA were once part of a large mountain chain * Rocks found in Britain were formaed in desert conditions
Paleomagnetic evidence was used to confirm the theory of plate tectonics. By studying the alignment of magnetic minerals in rocks, scientists were able to support the idea that continents have moved over time, providing evidence for the movement of tectonic plates.
Yes. From meteorite heat and pressure, for instance.