0
What else can I help you with?
What are the main advantages of the SBC Global mail system?
There are a number of advantages of a SBC Global mail system address. Firstly one can transfer all their existing mail and addresses to this account easily. Secondly it can be accessed from any online computer.
What sort of materials received by an organisation would not be part of the record system?
Materials that are not considered part of an organization's record system typically include personal items, such as employee's personal mail, lunch bags, or other non-work related belongings. Additionally, items that are deemed irrelevant to the organization's operations or official business, like advertisements or junk mail, are also typically not included in the record system.
Which scientists oppose the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming?
A recent poll of scientists in different fields has found that 97% of climate scientists who had published at least half of their peer-reviewed research in the climate field (a total of 76 out of 79 who participated in the survey (total number of particpants 3,146), Doran and Kendall Zimmermann, 2009) agreed that global temperatures are rising and that human activity was significant in this process. This is the mainstream scientific position.It is hard to find any research scientist working in the fields of atmospheric science or climate who actually believes there has not been a rise in average global temperatures since the beginning of the Industrial Age. Richard Lindzen, a professor of Atmospheric Science but widely regarded as a contrarian, agreed that global warming is occurring and could be caused by increased carbon dioxide (CO2) levels but believed that scientists were not in a position to prove the connection. Garth Paltridge, retired Chief Research Scientist at the CSIRO Division of Atmospheric Research, agreed that there are good reasons to believe that burning fossil fuels could lead to global warming, but was uncertain as to how significant this would be.Richard Muller, a Physics Professor and longtime critic of climate studies, set out to address what he called "the legitimate concerns" of sceptics who believe global warming is exaggerated. But Professor Muller unexpectedly told a congressional hearing the work of the three principal groups that have analysed the temperature trends underlying climate science is "excellent ... We see a global warming trend that is very similar to that previously reported by the other groups." It appears that Muller no longer believes that global warming is not real.Doran and Kendall Zimmerman found that the members of the scientific community most likely to oppose the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming were economic geologists (typically employed by oil companies and the like), of whom only 47 per cent concurred.Some other scientists who have opposed the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming are:David Douglas, solid-state physicist, professor, Department of Physics and Astronomy, at the University of Rochester, argued that global warming was a natural process and stated in an article titled New Study Explodes Human-Global Warming Study: "The observed pattern of warming, comparing surface and atmospheric temperature trends, does not show the characteristic fingerprint associated with greenhouse warming. The inescapable conclusion is that the human contribution is not significant and that observed increases in carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases make only a negligible contribution to climate warming"Antonio Zinchini, emeritus professor of nuclear physics at the University of Bologna and president of the World Federation of Scientists has challenged the accuracy of IPCC climate projections, stating: "models used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) are incoherent and invalid from a scientific point of view [...] It is not possible to exclude that the observed phenomena may have natural causes. It may be that man has little or nothing to do with it"Another eminent scientist to challenge IPCC projections is Hendrik Tennekes, retired Director of Research, Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute who wrote in his article "A Sceptical View of Climate Models": "The blind adherence to the harebrained idea that climate models can generate 'realistic' simulations of climate is the principal reason why I remain a climate skeptic. From my background in turbulence I look forward with grim anticipation to the day that climate models will run with a horizontal resolution of less than a kilometer. The horrible predictability problems of turbulent flows then will descend on climate science with a vengeance"Tim Patterson, paleoclimatologist and Professor of Geology at Carleton University, Canada, went even further. Giving evidence before (the Canadian) Commons Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development in 2006, he stated: "There is no meaningful correlation between CO2 levels and Earth's temperature over this [geologic] time frame. In fact, when CO2 levels were over ten times higher than they are now, about 450 million years ago, the planet was in the depths of the absolute coldest period in the last half billion years. On the basis of this evidence, how could anyone still believe that the recent relatively small increase in CO2 levels would be the major cause of the past century's modest warming?"Another respected meteorologist to challenge "alarmist" claims, such as those made by ex-presidential candidate Al Gore in his film "An Inconvenient Truth" is Dr Dick Morgan. The former World Meteorological Organization and climatology researcher at the University of Exeter, contradicted claims made in the film, stating: "There has been some decrease in ice thickness in the Canadian Arctic over the past 30 years but no melt down. The Canadian Ice Service records show that from 1971-1981 there was average, to above average, ice thickness. From 1981-1982 there was a sharp decrease of 15% but there was a quick recovery to average, to slightly above average, values from 1983-1995. A sharp drop of 30% occurred again 1996-1998 and since then there has been a steady increase to reach near normal conditions since 2001." He went on to criticise the projections of the IPCC, stating: "Had the IPCC used the standard parameter for climate change and used an equal area projection, instead of the Mercator warming and cooling would have been almost in balance."Another eminent scientist to Challenge the IPCC's findings is Professor Mojib Latif, a leading member of the IPCC, and head of a research team at the world-renowned Lebniz Institute, At Kiel University, Germany. Prof. Mojib and his team developed new methods to measure ocean temperatures at depths of upto a kilometre, where the cooling and warming cycles begin, and predicted a new cooling trend in a paper published in 2008 and reiterated his findings at an IPCC conference in Geneva in September 2009. On 10 Januray 2010, in an interview with the British Mail on Sunday newspaper he stated: "A significant share of the warming we saw from 1980 to 2000 and at earlier periods in the 20th Century was due to these cycles - perhaps as much as 50 per cent. 'They have now gone into reverse, so winters like this one will become much more likely. Summers will also probably be cooler, and all this may well last two decades or longer. The extreme retreats that we have seen in glaciers and sea ice will come to a halt. For the time being, global warming has paused, and there may well be some cooling."
What are some controversies of the theory of global warming?
The controversies are largely political rather than scientific. Virtually all climate scientists concur human activity is responsible for most of the current measured temperature change. Here is a typical list of "controversies." 1. The sun is the source of earth's heat, and the cause of current warming. While it is true the sun warms earth's surface (earth's interior is instead warmed by the slow decay of long lived nuclear isotopes), there has been no significant change in solar output over the past four decades. Nor has there been any particularly unusual solar activity in the past four hundred years, since Galileo first began making telescopic solar observations. 2. Man cannot alter his environment. This is patently absurd. 3. Since past climate change was NOT the result of human activity, the present climate change cannot possibly be the result of human activity. 4. Earth is actually cooling. This is contradicted by average global temperature measurements. 5. Science is unreliable, and climate scientists in particular are all liberal idiots conspiring to demolish the global economy. 6. Plants and animals evolved before, they can rapidly adapt to new changes. 7. Ice ages were predicted in the 1970s. The statement above is largely false. Whereas one or two popular press articles concerned oncoming ice ages, these were not considered incipient, nor are there peer reviewed papers in climate science journals predicting ice ages on the basis of human carbon emissions. 8. "Climategate" proves evil scientists colluded to destroy western civilization. Back in reality, none of the e-mail stolen from East Anglia University implicate scientists in any malfeasance or wrong doing whatsoever, according to four independent investigations. Furthermore, subsequent analysis of the temperature data also reveal earth has been warming at an accelerated rate. Finally, climate models run by four major independent laboratories (National Center for Atmospheric Research, Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, Hadley Center for Climate Prediction and Research, and the Max Planck Institute for Meteorology) all indicate a strong positive correlation between anthropogenic CO2 and global warming. 9. Volcanoes emit more CO2 than humans. Completely false. USGS data indicates humans now emit more than 100 times as much CO2 as all earth's volcanoes and ocean out gassing combined. The statement came from a conflation of something Rush Limbaugh once said about Chlorofluorocarbons (CFS) with CO2--which also happened to be false. Many of these controversies have been manufactured by the Heartland Institute, a propaganda organ of the oil industry. This same group was earlier responsible for promoting the myth there was no connection between cigarettes and lung cancer.
What are the major components of household trash?
The major components of household trash typically include food waste, paper products (such as cardboard and newspapers), plastics, glass bottles and jars, aluminum cans, and organic waste. Other common items may include clothing, electronics, and household items.
What is the Internet's version of junk mail?
e mail junk
Can NOT get your junk mail to go to junk mail folder?
i think
Why is junk mail a problem?
Email junk mail-annoying Junk mail that you receive in your mailbox- waste of paper, waste of shipping
When was The Junk Mail created?
The Junk Mail was created on 1997-10-30.
If you join as a user on WikiAnswers do they send you junk mail?
No junk mail!
What is the population of Junk Mail Publishing?
Junk Mail Publishing's population is 500.
When was Junk Mail Publishing created?
Junk Mail Publishing was created in 1992.
What is another name for junk mail?
Spam
How do you prevent your legitimate email replies from being tagged as spam and ending up in MSN junk mail?
Try to save the e-mail addresses of the legit e-mailers in your address book, hopefully this will prevent them being sent to the junk mail box. Try this, should work. You could also try lowering the strength of your spam control.
Why should you get rid of junk mail?
Because it is JUNK MAIL, and it could be dangerous. you don't want to have dangerous mail because your computer might get a virus. Delete all junk mail you get! Do Not Open Them!
Direct mail special form of junk mail?
No, It is still junk mail but remember...it keeps the cost of your stamps way down.
Is it illegal to sent junk mail to someone else?
You must be more specific. What do you mean by "junk mail?"
