answersLogoWhite

0

Justifiable conduct means the action was warranted or reasonable given the circumstances, such as self-defense. Excusable conduct refers to actions that are considered wrong but are forgiven due to circumstances like being a minor or mentally ill. In essence, justifiable conduct is seen as acceptable, whereas excusable conduct is viewed as wrong but understandable.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

1y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What is other word for defensible?

valid, plausible, justifiable, tenable, logical, permissible, excusable, defendable


What is meant by Justifiable homicide and excusable homicide?

I'm not familiar with the term "Excusable" Homicide. Justifiable Homicide occurs when it is ruled (usually a Grand Jury) that a death of someone was proper and occurred within the bounds of law (i.e.: the shooting death of an armed bank robber by a police officer).


What is a prefix for Excusable?

The prefix for "excusable" is "un-".


What is Redline Limitation?

A co-felon is not guilty of felony murder where the killing constitutes a justifiable or excusable homicide. Such would be the case where, for example, the police or a Victim shoots one of the co-felons, but not where the killing is done by one of the Felons.


How do you use excusable in sentences?

Late arrival for a job interview is never excusable.


What rhymes with usable?

excusable


What part of speech is the word justifiable?

Justifiable is an adjective.


Is justifiable an adverb?

No. The adverb form of justifiable is justifiably.


What is the verb form of justifiable?

The verb form of "justifiable" is "justify".


What are some legitimate excuses for excusable neglect?

Excusable Neglect (CCP473(b)): To be excusable, the neglect must have been the act or omission of a reasonably prudent person under the circumstances. Forgetting the lawsuit, being too busy to properly respond, or being unable to afford an attorney are not ground for excusable neglect. Examples of excusable neglect include: * Illnes that disables the party from responding on apearing in court * Failure to respond because you relied on your attorney to do so * Failure to appear at trial because you relied on misinformation provided by a court officer.


Is the struggle for liberalism and constitutionalism justifiable?

Is the struggle of liberalism and constitutionalism justifiable?why?


Is the struggle for liberalism constitutionalism justifiable?

Is the struggle of liberalism and constitutionalism justifiable?why?