An oversimplification of the second law of thermodynamics would state, "Everything cools down." Then the nature of living things would be the need to add energy to counter this cooling down. Humans add this energy by eating food and combining it with oxygen. Thus, the food and oxygen produces energy that can be lost to entropy.
Yes they are no go kiss ur daddy
chair, CLASS ROOM
this increase in organization over time in no way violates the second law. The entropy of a particular system, such as an organism, may actually decrease, so long as the total entropy of the universe-the system plus its surroundings-increases. Thus, organisms are islands of low entropy in an increasingly random universe. The evolution of biological order is perfectly consistent with the laws of thermodynamics.
Absolutely. The laws of thermodynamics do no require determining whether a system contains living things or not in order to be applied.To get work out of a train engine you have to supply it with energy - in the form of electricity or chemical energy from coal or oil or diesel.To get work out of human being you have to supply them with energy in the form of the chemical energy contained in the food they eat.The equations for both are the same - only the sources of the energy change - and frankly you could still burn food in a train engine boiler, it just wouldn't be as efficient.
The Second Law of Thermodynamics states that a system with no energy input and no losses will tend towards a zero energy state. This is essentially the entropy of any energy exchange. Thus, you require a constant input of energy to maintain any system.
The second law of thermodynamics in AP Biology helps explain how energy flows within living organisms. It states that energy transformations increase the disorder or entropy of a system. This law is important in understanding processes like metabolism and cellular respiration, which involve the transfer of energy and the production of waste heat.
Biology is a branch of science that focuses on the study of living organisms and their interactions with the environment, while physical science deals with the study of non-living systems such as physics and chemistry. However, biology also incorporates principles from physical sciences like physics and chemistry to explain biological processes at a molecular and cellular level. For example, understanding the laws of thermodynamics helps explain how energy is transferred within living organisms.
relationship between the thermodynamic quantity entropy
It is correct to say "The family was in the living room." "Was" is the correct verb to use when referring to a singular subject, such as "family."
should science pursue the synthesis of a living cell. Yes or No. Explain
Yes. To live forever would violate the laws of thermodynamics. The only way not to would be to have no changes, which would not be living.
Correct, a spider web is non-living.
The correct spelling is "environment" (living conditions, living zone).
yes because if you were is correct english
That is the correct spelling of "livable" (suitable for living, worth living, habitable).
The "live there" is more technically correct. However, either may be correct. "People who live there" has a context of ordinarily or typically. "(The) People who are living there (now) is a current context.
Turks