Answer:
In fact light speed is not the question you should be asking. It should be "when traveling at the universal speed limit, why does time slow down." The answer is that no matter how fast you are traveling the universal speed limit (equal to light speed because it goes max speed) is viewed the same. The theory is that all clocks/measuring devices are morphed in the same way so that when it measures the speed limit it is still the speed of light (universal speed limit)
AKA, all clocks, even biological, are slowed down as it travels faster through space time. So your perception is slowed and your recognition of this perception is slowed, so for you time appears the same. If you travel 95% the speed of light and flick on a light, it wont travel 5% the speed of light away from you, it will travel 100% the speed of light away from you due to your space time warping. This also happens the nearer you are to a large mass. aka a black hole. It also warps the space time around you.
Alternate points of view... Take for example, you are traveling in a car at any speed. You pass cars traveling slower than you are. They appear to travel backwards. This is of course only relative to YOU. They are actually traveling forwards. If you think of yourself in the car as the speed of light, and the other cars as time, that's how it works. Of course, light travels SO fast that it bends TIME only relative to YOU. It's not like the whole world actually stops or slows down. It's only you who feels it. Just like overtaking a car. But that's only a simple explanation.
In laymans terms, traveling at light speed means that you are traveling at a speed greater than the speed of time. Therefore time is at a fixed rate, and the speed that light travels is at a fixed rate also. So to travel light speed actually gives you an advantage over time itself. It has been mathematically determined that the longer you travel at this speed, the more advantage you gain, so it would be possible for a child to travel at this speed for a computed time, and return to see that several generations have passed while he/she would have only aged the number of days / months traveled in spaceship time.
Another layman's view:Traveling at light speed really doesn't negate time. It is just that time is relative, as is velocity. My computer seems motionless to me, but an observer looking down at the solar system would see me and my computer moving quite rapidly. If you could get into a ship and accelerate to very near the speed of light and travel for ten earth years, your personal experience of time will not seem to you to have been any different from when you were on earth. Every moment would have passed normally for you, without anything seeming odd. It's just that at the end of the trip, you will have experienced it as only a fraction of the ten years. It will seem impossible to you that 10 years has gone by on earth. Time will have gone by differently for you than for earth. The same thing would happen even if you could reach the velocity of light. Upon decelerating, you would not report anything unusual regarding your experience of the passage of time; time will have passed for you as normally as ever. But you will notice that you spanned a huge distance instantaneously. You would find it nearly impossible to believe that dozens, hundreds or thousands of earth years had passed by during that instantaneous surge. From your vantage point in that ship, you could as easily ask: How does traveling at light speed accelerate time (for earth)? It doesn't.None. At the speed of light, time stops completely. It is impossible for anything with an invariant mass to move at the speed of light; only particles with no "rest mass" (such as photons) can do so.
Traveling 20 million light years at the speed of light would take 20 million years. Since we do not currently have technology that can travel at the speed of light, it would take much longer using current spacecraft technology.
It has no acceleration. The definition of acceleration is the change in velocity over time, so if it is traveling at a constant speed, it has no acceleration. Also, the speed of light is a constant, which means it does not change.
The speed of light is always the same as long as it's traveling through the same medium. But its speed is different in different media, and those are all less than its speed in vacuum.
If you mean, shouldn't light be everywhere at once... then no. Time only slows down for matter traveling close to the speed of light. And by 'slows down', I mean it's only slower to stationary observers watching the speeding matter. To the speeding matter everything is business as usual, but the universe looks a little different. You start to notice things like time dilation (the universe around you seems to speed up) and space flattening (the amount of space you travel through to get places seems much less). So, to answer your initial question, to a stationary observer, what's going on in a light ray may seem stopped, but the speed the light ray is traveling is measurable. The cool thing about this is, since time is stopped for the photon compared to the rest of us, they never age. That's how we can observe the light from galaxies that are 10 billion light years away.
To an outside observer a person traveling at the speed of light would be frozen in time. To the person traveling at the speed of light, things would seem normal.
Time required to do what? To move from one place to another, divide the distance by the speed of light.
Traveling on a beam of light is not possible for objects with mass, as light moves at the fastest speed in the universe and cannot be caught up to. Traveling at the speed of light would also cause time dilation effects, where time would appear to stand still for the traveler.
It dosent unless you are traveling the speed of light it slow's down. The sun going down isnt time.
According to the theory of relativity, time does not stop at the speed of light, but rather it slows down. This means that for an object traveling at the speed of light, time would appear to pass more slowly compared to an observer at rest.
It really depends on your speed. If you were traveling at the speed of light, it would take 600 years. 600 light years equals 3,527,175,223,910,165 miles. So divide that by the speed you would be traveling to get the length of time it would take you.
Light always travels at the speed of light. The only time that's 299,792,458 meters per second ( " c " ) is when it's traveling in vacuum.
It really depends on your speed. If you were traveling at the speed of light, it would take 600 years. 600 light years equals 3,527,175,223,910,165 miles. So divide that by the speed you would be traveling to get the length of time it would take you.
None. At the speed of light, time stops completely. It is impossible for anything with an invariant mass to move at the speed of light; only particles with no "rest mass" (such as photons) can do so.
cruising speed
Traveling 40 light years would take 40 years at the speed of light.
It's a nonsense statement; someone's attempt to sound profound. Light doesn't travel through time, so there is no temporal speed of light, nor is there any definable equivalent velocity through time.