They do not have any.They are only in eukariyotes
That means that it is a Prokaryote, or a bacterial cell.
I'm not sure about chloroplasts, but with mitochondria evolutionary history has led biolgists to believe that the mitochondria now present in eukaryotic cells to have originated a couple billion years ago when a very basic eukaryotic cell injested (ate) a bacterial cell. Then, instead of digesting it for food, the bacterial cell just stayed inside and functioned with the eukaryotic cell. The evidence for this lies in the structure, genetic information (mitochondria have their own DNA and replicate separately) and proteins present. This is why it could be considered a cell (bacterial), because it, at one point in history, was an actual bacterial cell. i think the above answer is a little misleading to the question. so my answer is mitochondria and chloroplast are not considered cells or bacteria. bacteria is a cell and mitochondria and chloroplasts can be found in cells (plant and animal cells, not bacteria cells).
One structure you would not find in a bacterial cell is a mitochondrion. One bacterial disease that is transmitted by contaminated drinking water is cholera.
Mitochondria and chloroplasts for two contributions here through endosymbiosis.
No mitochondria have no nucleus at all but it contains its own DNA(which resembles to bacterial DNA or genome).
Any sort of organelles... nor lysosomes, golgi apparatus, mitochondria etc...
That means that it is a Prokaryote, or a bacterial cell.
mitochondria, lysosomes, endoplasmic reticulum....
I'm not sure about chloroplasts, but with mitochondria evolutionary history has led biolgists to believe that the mitochondria now present in eukaryotic cells to have originated a couple billion years ago when a very basic eukaryotic cell injested (ate) a bacterial cell. Then, instead of digesting it for food, the bacterial cell just stayed inside and functioned with the eukaryotic cell. The evidence for this lies in the structure, genetic information (mitochondria have their own DNA and replicate separately) and proteins present. This is why it could be considered a cell (bacterial), because it, at one point in history, was an actual bacterial cell. i think the above answer is a little misleading to the question. so my answer is mitochondria and chloroplast are not considered cells or bacteria. bacteria is a cell and mitochondria and chloroplasts can be found in cells (plant and animal cells, not bacteria cells).
Any sort of organelles... nor lysosomes, golgi apparatus, mitochondria etc...
One structure you would not find in a bacterial cell is a mitochondrion. One bacterial disease that is transmitted by contaminated drinking water is cholera.
E coli are bacterial type.They do not have mitochondria.
Mitochondria and chloroplasts for two contributions here through endosymbiosis.
No mitochondria have no nucleus at all but it contains its own DNA(which resembles to bacterial DNA or genome).
Mitochondria have their own ribosomes because they are believed to have originated from ancient bacteria that were engulfed by a eukaryotic cell. These ribosomes help mitochondria synthesize some of their own proteins independently from the cell's main protein synthesis machinery. This allows mitochondria to quickly respond to their metabolic needs.
You would expect to find many mitochondria in a muscle cell. This is because the mitochondria makes the energy fo a cell, and muscle cells need alot of energy to do their job. The more energy a cell needs to do its job, the more mitochondria it has.
No, mitochondria are not viruses. Mitochondria are organelles found in eukaryotic cells that play a key role in generating energy for the cell through a process called cellular respiration. They are believed to have originated from bacterial cells that were engulfed by primitive eukaryotic cells through a process known as endosymbiosis.