It depends on the genetics of the parents. If both parents carry a short gene, then all the offspring would have a chance of being short. If only one parent carries the short gene, then approximately half of the offspring would be short.
The genotype of the offspring with short whiskers would depend on the genetic basis of whisker length, which may be influenced by dominant and recessive alleles. If short whiskers are a recessive trait, the offspring could be homozygous recessive (ss) or heterozygous (Ss) if one or both parents carry the dominant allele for long whiskers (S). If both parents are homozygous for short whiskers (ss), then all offspring will also have the genotype ss.
The inheritance of flower color and stem length depends on the specific genetic traits of the parent plants. If we assume that purple flower color and short stem length are dominant traits, and white flower color and long stem length are recessive, then the offspring from the cross would inherit one allele from each parent. Thus, while all the offspring would have purple flowers due to the dominance of that trait, they could inherit either short or long stems depending on the genetic makeup of the short-stemmed parent. If the short-stemmed parent is homozygous for short stems (SS), all offspring would be short-stemmed; if heterozygous (Ss), then some offspring could be long-stemmed.
When Mendel crossed short tt pea plants (homozygous recessive) with short pea plants that were heterozygous for height (Tt), the offspring would display a phenotypic ratio of 1 short (tt) to 1 tall (Tt). This is because the short plants (tt) can only contribute recessive alleles, while the heterozygous plants (Tt) can contribute either a dominant (T) or a recessive (t) allele. Therefore, half of the offspring would be tall and half would be short.
The Punnett square would show that all offspring would be heterozygous for the trait, meaning they would have one allele for tall plants and one allele for short plants. This would result in all offspring being tall plants phenotypically, but carrying the allele for short plants.
tall and short
Yes it is purebred. Because it had to sex to come in life. thanks to everyone.
The Punnett square would show that all offspring would be heterozygous for the trait, meaning they would have one allele for tall plants and one allele for short plants. This would result in all offspring being tall plants phenotypically, but carrying the allele for short plants.
tall and short
no. in the second generation it will have a short offspring , but in the first generation it will have tall offspring
If eastern cougars did not have offspring, they would become extinct. They have one or two at a time.
3
You would expect a 1:1 ratio of offspring with a long body (LL) to offspring with a short body (ll) due to the incomplete dominance of the gene for body length in Drosophila.
An F1 x F1 cross would be a cross between heterozygous (Tt) parents. The offspring would be 1/4 TT, 1/2 Tt, and 1/4 tt. This would mean that 3/4 of the offspring would be tall, and 1/4 would be short.These offspring would be the F2 generation. Click on the related link to see an illustration of this using Punnett squares.
good stuff
If one fruit fly is heterozygous for long wings and the other is homozygous for short wings, the expected percentage of their offspring having long wings would be 50%. This is because when the long-winged parent passes on the dominant long-wing allele and the short-winged parent passes on the recessive short-wing allele, the offspring would have one of each allele, resulting in the offspring having long wings.
The combination of a female offspring would be XX
It would depend on the dominant gene: I would compare the mother's parents eyelashes to the father's parents eyelashes, for each of the parent's eyelashes that are long it is an increase in 25% that the offspring will have long eyelashes. Unless half of the father's parents have long lashes then that shows the short lash gene is dominant.