Practically all astronomers and physicists accept the Big Bang model, and more specifically, the LCDM model. Outside of the fields of astronomy and physics, acceptance may be a bit less, but still constitutes a vast majority of the scientific community.
It depends, because some might say 'scientists'. But not all scientists believe in this theory. Also, there are those who believe in a similar idea to the Big Bang, but it is not refered to as 'The Big Band Theory.'
Almost all Jewish scientists, like almost all Gentile scientists, accept the Big Bang as the correct description of our Universe. The only people who accept Genesis are Biblical literalists, and they do so in spite of scientific evidence. There is no serious evidence whatsoever to support a Universe that has existed for only a few thousand years. That being an irrefutable fact, I seriously doubt there are many Jewish scientists that are Biblical literalists.
The Big Bang Theory does not break any specific laws of physics. It is a scientific model that describes the origin and evolution of the universe based on observations and theoretical calculations. However, there are still many questions and mysteries surrounding the Big Bang Theory that scientists are actively working to understand.
There are many reasons why people might not believe in the Big Bang Theory; i.e. some reasons are religious and spiritual, while others are conflicted about rivals cosmological theories, and some just either do not understand or misunderstand the concepts.
At first, many eminent scientists had trouble reconciling the notion of an expanding universe with their convictions. Albert Einstein, for instance, did not accept the notion until the evidence for it had become almost overwhelming, favouring, like many others, the idea of a static universe. For the next few decades, scientific support was pretty evenly divided over Steady State and Big Bang.It wasn't until 1965 that, with the discovery of the Cosmic Microwave Background, the scientific consensus swayed overwhelmingly towards supporting the Big Bang theory. Today, of course, it is the accepted model, the consensus view.
The Big Bang theory is the most widely accepted.
The Big Bang theory is the most widely accepted.
Still now the most acceptable theory on the origin of universe has been the big bang theory. you can get more info on big bang theory from wikipedia.
Many scientists accept the Big Bang theory as the explanation for the origin of the universe. This theory proposes that the universe began as a singularity approximately 13.8 billion years ago, and has been expanding ever since. The evidence for the Big Bang includes the cosmic microwave background radiation and the observed redshift of distant galaxies.
The Big Bang Theory
Before the Big Bang theory, many scientists believed that the universe was static, or infinitely unchanging.
the quantum theory
It depends, because some might say 'scientists'. But not all scientists believe in this theory. Also, there are those who believe in a similar idea to the Big Bang, but it is not refered to as 'The Big Band Theory.'
Almost all Jewish scientists, like almost all Gentile scientists, accept the Big Bang as the correct description of our Universe. The only people who accept Genesis are Biblical literalists, and they do so in spite of scientific evidence. There is no serious evidence whatsoever to support a Universe that has existed for only a few thousand years. That being an irrefutable fact, I seriously doubt there are many Jewish scientists that are Biblical literalists.
The big bang theory has nothing to do with the formation of planets.
The Big Bang Theory does not break any specific laws of physics. It is a scientific model that describes the origin and evolution of the universe based on observations and theoretical calculations. However, there are still many questions and mysteries surrounding the Big Bang Theory that scientists are actively working to understand.
Alfred Wegener did not have the "HOW" factor- because of no evidence on the process, they could not believe his theory.