If you are standing in the umbra during a solar eclipse, you would see none of the sun. The umbra is the innermost and darkest part of the shadow cast by the moon, where the sun is completely obscured. This results in a total eclipse, where the sun is entirely hidden from view.
If you are standing in the umbra, you would see none of the Sun. The umbra is the darkest part of a shadow during an eclipse, where the light from the Sun is completely blocked by an object, such as the Moon during a solar eclipse. In this region, the Sun is entirely obscured, creating a total eclipse effect.
Standing on the equator, you would not see any circumpolar stars. Circumpolar stars are those that never dip below the horizon, and they can only be seen from latitudes above a certain threshold, typically around 25 degrees (North or South) or higher. The closer you are to the poles, the more circumpolar stars you can see.
No, you wouldn't be able to see the curve of Pluto from its surface. Pluto's gravity is much weaker than Earth's, so the surface would appear relatively flat to an observer standing on it.
Yes, a person standing on the Moon would see a total solar eclipse if they were positioned in the right spot during a lunar eclipse. From the Moon's perspective, the Earth would pass directly in front of the Sun, creating a total eclipse. However, because the Moon has no atmosphere, the view would be stark and dramatic, with the Earth appearing as a dark disk silhouetted against the bright solar corona. This phenomenon is distinct from how we experience solar eclipses from Earth.
If you were standing at the Earth's South Pole, you would see stars near the South Celestial Pole, such as Sigma Octantis, which is the closest star to the pole and remains nearly fixed in the sky. Most stars would appear to move in a circular path around the pole, rising and setting horizontally at the horizon. Constellations like the Southern Cross (Crux) and Centaurus would be visible, while stars in the northern hemisphere, like Polaris, would not be visible at all.
If you were standing on the moon, you would see a barren landscape with vast plains, rocky terrain, and mountains. The sky would appear black, and you would see Earth in the distance, appearing much larger than the moon appears from Earth. The lack of atmosphere would mean there would be no weather, clouds, or breathable air.
If you are standing on the full moon you would be facing the earth at night.
It would cost anything around 90 - 80 cents.
Standing on the equator, you would not see any circumpolar stars. Circumpolar stars are those that never dip below the horizon, and they can only be seen from latitudes above a certain threshold, typically around 25 degrees (North or South) or higher. The closer you are to the poles, the more circumpolar stars you can see.
No, you wouldn't be able to see the curve of Pluto from its surface. Pluto's gravity is much weaker than Earth's, so the surface would appear relatively flat to an observer standing on it.
If a person is standing at point b, they would likely see a sunrise if point b is located to the east of the area where the sun is rising. Alternatively, they would see a sunset if point b is west of the area where the sun is setting.
No because you are standing on a angle on the moon so you would not see more than one side of the earth
kick him in the backside. and then brake his arm. then see if he is still standing up
You would use volume to see how much juice is in a jug.
no, not from where im standing
If they are standing by you.
Probably the whole body in the front (standing up)