If supernovae never occurred, the universe would lack the explosive processes that create and distribute heavy elements necessary for planet formation and life. Stars would evolve differently, potentially leading to fewer diverse types of stars and planets. The recycling of stellar material into new generations of stars would be hindered, resulting in a less enriched interstellar medium. Consequently, the complexity of chemical compounds essential for life as we know it might not exist, fundamentally altering the potential for life in the universe.
The universe is so big and it will never be completely populated because it includes areas that are unlivable. The Earth is part of the whole universe.
The Universe was never smaller than an atom.
No. Hurricane Katrina dissipated in 2005 and will never return. Hurricane Sandy occurred seven years after Katrina and is a completely different storm.
because you can never ever tell when a thing will happen
I don't think a "resonant frequency" makes much sense for the Universe. Even a single vibration would never be able to get back and forth, even if it's only through the OBSERVABLE Universe.
universe never ends
A full moon has just occurred. That never occurred to me.
The never to be is something that never will occur, whereas the never was is something that has never occurred. They are both non-existent - however, the universe is entropic and is always moving into the future. From a subjective perspective, the never to be is something that you can prepare for: you can prepare for what might happen, and you can prepare for what might not happen. From an objective perspective, the universe is not deterministic: inherent quantum uncertainties (the Heisenberg Principle) describe this. Therefore, we can only predict to very high probabilities what will be and will never be. Therefore while both are non-existent, the non-existent future might stilll happen. A non-existent past never has existed (but may still happen, in which it become an existent past). In this instance the never was is not the never to be. It never was and never will be. There's irony for you. If the non-existent past never has and never will occur, then the never was is the never to be. So to sum up: They are both non-existent. They are the same if the non-existent past will never occur/the non-existent future never has occurred. They are different when the non-existent future has occurred in the past.
People have different opinions about this question; some think that it is never ending, others think it is not. In my opinion I think the universe has a boundary and is not never ending due to the fact that everything has an end, it cant go on for ever, but its your choice what you think about it - like religions, people believe what they think is more likely to be true.
never never never
we will never know.
Portugal has never won a Miss Universe title.
Well, the universe never stops so... the universe does not have a center.
By definition, beside and never intersecting our universe. ;)
Afghanistan has never won Miss Universe.
The universe is so big and it will never be completely populated because it includes areas that are unlivable. The Earth is part of the whole universe.
WW2 would've been WW1.