It is a simple ratio charge/mass or e/m .
The neutron has no charge, therefore the charge to mass ratio for the neutron is zero.
The charge-mass ratio of a proton is approximately 9.58 x 10^7 coulombs per kilogram (C/kg). This value is a fundamental property that describes the ratio of the charge of a proton to its mass. It is commonly used in particle physics experiments and calculations.
A balanced equation for charge and mass ensures that the total charge and mass are conserved in a chemical reaction. This means that the sum of the charges and the sum of the masses of the reactants must equal the sum of the charges and masses of the products. In a chemical equation, this is represented by having equal numbers of each type of atom and matching charges on both sides of the equation. For example, in the reaction of hydrogen and oxygen to form water, the balanced equation is 2H₂ + O₂ → 2H₂O, which maintains both mass and charge balance.
J.J.Thompson determined the electron charge to mass ratio. His results, however, were off by almost a factor of two, although they were consistent, leading us to believe there was some systematic error in his measurements.
The charge to mass ratio of an electron is approximately -1.76 x 10^11 coulombs per kilogram. This means that electrons have a very small mass compared to their charge. This value was first measured by J.J. Thomson in his experiments with cathode rays.
The neutron has no charge, therefore the charge to mass ratio for the neutron is zero.
The electron has the highest charge to mass ratio. This is because it has a tiny mass compared to its charge, making its ratio very high.
Compared to the (charge/mass) ratio of the electron:-- The (charge/mass) ratio of the proton is much smaller; although the proton charge is equal to the electron charge, the proton mass is much larger, by a factor of more than 1,800.-- The (charge/mass) ratio of the neutron is zero, because the neutron charge is zero.
The charge and mass ratio of proton is constant, the positive particles found during discharge tube experiment are nuclei of atoms which have different charge and mass ratio.
Modern Mass Spectrometry is the alternative method to measure the charge to mass ratio of an electron.
To derive the formula for force (F) using the equation fma, you can rearrange the equation to solve for force. By dividing both sides of the equation by mass (m), you get F ma, where force (F) is equal to mass (m) multiplied by acceleration (a). This formula shows the relationship between force, mass, and acceleration.
The charge-mass ratio of a proton is approximately 9.58 x 10^7 coulombs per kilogram (C/kg). This value is a fundamental property that describes the ratio of the charge of a proton to its mass. It is commonly used in particle physics experiments and calculations.
They have the same mass/charge ratio.
Millikan found the charge of an electron by his famous oil drop experiment. J J Thomson determined the specific charge of the electron. That means the ratio of the charge of an electron to its mass. With these two values one can find the mass of electron by dividing the charge value by its specific charge.
The equation that shows conservation of both mass and charge is the continuity equation, ∂ρ/∂t + ∇⋅J = 0, where ρ is the charge density and J is the current density in an electromagnetic field. This equation states that the rate of change of charge density plus the divergence of the current density must equal zero, implying that charge is conserved locally. Additionally, in nuclear reactions, mass-energy equivalence (E=mc^2) relates the conservation of mass and energy.
The equation Emc2 can be derived from Einstein's theory of special relativity, which states that energy (E) and mass (m) are interchangeable and related by the speed of light (c) squared. This equation shows that a small amount of mass can be converted into a large amount of energy.
J.J.Thompson determined the electron charge to mass ratio. His results, however, were off by almost a factor of two, although they were consistent, leading us to believe there was some systematic error in his measurements.