it could just mean someone else in the family has that characteristic.
Not necessarily. The presence of a characteristic in a child does not always indicate dominance over a non-possessing parent. Traits can be influenced by multiple factors, including genetics, environmental factors, and random chance.
No probability. Neither parent has an "A" for the child to inherit to make an "AB".
No, a baby cannot be born with a CF gene if neither parent has the gene. Cystic fibrosis is an autosomal recessive genetic disorder, meaning both parents must be carriers of the mutated CF gene in order to have a child with the condition.
No. The A parent could be AA or AO and the rh factor could be ++ or +-. The O parent can only be OO and the rh factor could be ++ or +- They could produce an rh negative child if both parents are +- (heterozyous). Since neither parent has the B blood group it cannot be passed to their offspring. (Rarely, a parent could be a chimera and in this instance an abberant child could result from a mating between parents that appear totally normal...the operative phrase here is "Rarely!").
INHERITED for A~plus
such a characteristic that can be inherited is a child inheriting a parent's looks.
Not necessarily. The presence of a characteristic in a child does not always indicate dominance over a non-possessing parent. Traits can be influenced by multiple factors, including genetics, environmental factors, and random chance.
No, neither parent is required to help their child pay college tuition.
Neither the custodial parent's drug use nor the child's age is a defense against not paying past-due child support.
No. Neither parent should forbid the child to be in contact with the other parent unless there exists a court order to that effect. However, the parent who does not have the child at the time should not make a pest out of him/herself so as to intrude on the other parent's time with the child. Likewise, the child should not need to be in constant contact with the other parent. Adults should be able to handle this situation reasonably.No. Neither parent should forbid the child to be in contact with the other parent unless there exists a court order to that effect. However, the parent who does not have the child at the time should not make a pest out of him/herself so as to intrude on the other parent's time with the child. Likewise, the child should not need to be in constant contact with the other parent. Adults should be able to handle this situation reasonably.No. Neither parent should forbid the child to be in contact with the other parent unless there exists a court order to that effect. However, the parent who does not have the child at the time should not make a pest out of him/herself so as to intrude on the other parent's time with the child. Likewise, the child should not need to be in constant contact with the other parent. Adults should be able to handle this situation reasonably.No. Neither parent should forbid the child to be in contact with the other parent unless there exists a court order to that effect. However, the parent who does not have the child at the time should not make a pest out of him/herself so as to intrude on the other parent's time with the child. Likewise, the child should not need to be in constant contact with the other parent. Adults should be able to handle this situation reasonably.
That would be called genes. Genes is when a characteristic is past on from a mother to its child or a father to its child.
Yes, in joint physical with no difference in incomes.
No. The parent's possible blood types are BO and OO. If the child is AO something is incorrect. Neither parent has an A to pass along.
No. The parent's possible blood types are BO and OO. If the child is AO something is incorrect. Neither parent has an A to pass along.
No. The parent's possible blood types are BO and OO. If the child is AO something is incorrect. Neither parent has an A to pass along.
It is just the DNA lottery. If neither parent is colorblind that just means that one of them (or both of them) have recessive genes for colorblindness that happened to show up in this particular child.
There is a 50% chance of a child having dimples if one parent has them and a 75% chance if the two parents have them. A child can also have them as the result of a genetic mutation even if neither parent has dimples.