If scientists find an ice core from 30,000 years ago containing chemicals that are radically different from today's, they would likely conclude that there have been significant changes in the Earth's atmosphere and climate over time. These differences could indicate natural processes, such as volcanic eruptions or shifts in vegetation, as well as anthropogenic influences resulting from human activities. The findings could also suggest changes in global temperatures, ocean circulation, or atmospheric composition that have occurred over millennia. Such evidence would be crucial for understanding both historical climate patterns and the impact of human actions on the environment.
Scientists collect, organize, interpret, and conclude.
more research has to be done but as of now scientists conclude plants do not have senses
They are isotopes of each other.
These persons consider for example liquid water and water vapors as different substances.
We conclude that something must be renewing or eroding the surface.
it is a strog base
The gold-foil experiment led scientists to conclude that an atom's volume is mainly unoccupied.
Scientists collect, organize, interpret, and conclude.
Scientists concluded that meteroroids had bombared the moons surface.
That Earth is not at the center of the universe - - radical thinking for his time.
Earth solar orbit
I'm sure she figured it out by herself.
Do your homework and stop asking on Google your lazy.
because atoms are unseen so scientists or philosophers only conclude what comes to their mind, their thoughts and ideas. how will prove this if you can't? that's the disadvantages of always basing yourself on theories of scientists. People believe easily to them because they are philosophers but they didn't know how they conclude their theories.
scientests want to know why we have each thing on our bidy, how they devolop, and why some animals dont have thumbs
no one has discovered bones on the moon... but if we are talking about the math answers, then "the cow didnt make it"
7