answersLogoWhite

0

If scientists find an ice core from 30,000 years ago containing chemicals that are radically different from today's, they would likely conclude that there have been significant changes in the Earth's atmosphere and climate over time. These differences could indicate natural processes, such as volcanic eruptions or shifts in vegetation, as well as anthropogenic influences resulting from human activities. The findings could also suggest changes in global temperatures, ocean circulation, or atmospheric composition that have occurred over millennia. Such evidence would be crucial for understanding both historical climate patterns and the impact of human actions on the environment.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

3w ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What can the scientists conclude about the substance?

it is a strog base


The gold-foil experiment led scientists to conclude that an atom's?

The gold-foil experiment led scientists to conclude that an atom's volume is mainly unoccupied.


Scientist organize and?

Scientists collect, organize, interpret, and conclude.


What did scientists conclude from moon rocks that had been broken apart and then reformed?

Scientists concluded that meteroroids had bombared the moons surface.


What did Galileo's observations lead scientists to conclude?

That Earth is not at the center of the universe - - radical thinking for his time.


What did scientists conclude from stars appearing in the same position after a one year period?

Earth solar orbit


Did Sara Palin speak with scientists to conclude that global warming is not man made?

I'm sure she figured it out by herself.


What scientists conclude from the presence of myosin in both humans and yeast?

Do your homework and stop asking on Google your lazy.


Why do scientists use models to study molecules and atoms?

because atoms are unseen so scientists or philosophers only conclude what comes to their mind, their thoughts and ideas. how will prove this if you can't? that's the disadvantages of always basing yourself on theories of scientists. People believe easily to them because they are philosophers but they didn't know how they conclude their theories.


What do scientists conclude about thumbs?

scientests want to know why we have each thing on our bidy, how they devolop, and why some animals dont have thumbs


What did the scientists conclude after discovering the moon?

no one has discovered bones on the moon... but if we are talking about the math answers, then "the cow didnt make it"


How many proton collisions were run in the Tevatron before scientists confirmed their results to conclude that the Higgs boson particle existed?

7