If the polar ice caps melt, low-lying coastal areas would face the biggest immediate danger, particularly cities like Miami, New Orleans, and Jakarta. These regions are at risk of flooding due to rising sea levels, which can lead to significant infrastructure damage and displacement of populations. Additionally, small island nations such as the Maldives may become uninhabitable, exacerbating global migration and humanitarian crises.
cities on the ocean would be in danger of flooding. apex
If water would be a non polar molecule all the life chemistry would be changed or would not be possible. This non polar liquid would be unable to be a quasi-universal solvent.
The word 'polar' defines the latitude. Should the latitude change it would no longer be polar.
No, SiH4 is not polar. It is nonpolar. It is considered nonpolar because it does not have permanent dipole moments.
No. It is of no danger.
Coastal areas and low-lying islands would face the biggest immediate danger if the polar ice caps melt. The resulting rise in sea levels would lead to increased flooding and the loss of land.
If the polar ice caps melt, coastal areas would face the biggest immediate danger due to rising sea levels. Cities like Miami, New Orleans, and parts of Bangladesh and the Netherlands are particularly vulnerable, as they are situated at or below sea level. Additionally, low-lying island nations such as the Maldives and Tuvalu could face severe threats of flooding and loss of land, potentially displacing entire populations.
The polar bear would because as the polar bear is the biggest land predator on earth
The biggest source of danger would be electrocution. His head was in danger as the train raced through the tunnel.
polar bears because they are the biggest and strongest bear and carnivore
Cities on the ocean would be in danger of flooding
In my opinion, the biggest predators for seals are the polar bears. If anyone would like to add to my point please feel free to do so.
The polar bear has a weight advantage over the biggest lion. The biggest lion is as long as a polar bear and as tall as a ladder. Even if the polar bear and the biggest lion met and fought, the lion may win, but would get seriously injured.
cities on the ocean would be in danger of flooding. apex
gorrilas have one thing that the polar bear does not and that is the ability to grabbed with his thubms therefore after collaborting with my fellow scientist friends we have decided it would be a 64% chance of the gorrila winning. Wrong. A polar bear would definitely win the fight because it is the biggest predator on land and is a lot stronger and larger than a grizzly bear. If black bears and brown bears have no problems taking down gorillas, then polar bears would also have no problems too.
Yes but highly impractical. I don't know why someone would want to move whales unless they were in immediate catastrophic danger. Or going extinct. Et Cetera...
Considering that polar bears include many aquatic animals much bigger than an emperor penguin it's safe to say that a polar bear would enjoy a quick snack of an emperor penguin if they ever met and the bear was at all hungry. Even a baby polar bear would be more than a match for even the biggest living penguin.