answersLogoWhite

0

4

an increase in sediment, fallen leaves, and tree limbs accumulating on the bottom of the pond

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Natural Sciences

What would have most likely occurred if plants had not begun to live on land?

If plants had not evolved to live on land, it is likely that terrestrial ecosystems would have remained dominated by non-plant organisms such as fungi, bacteria, and algae. This would have drastically altered the development of terrestrial ecosystems and likely impacted the evolution of animals that rely on plants for food and habitat.


Which change would she most likely observe in the plant after a few days?

She would likely observe an increase in leaf growth or a change in flower color.


Which pond would most likely to lead to terrestrial succession?

A pond that is shallow and gradually fills in with sediment and organic material is most likely to lead to terrestrial succession. As aquatic plants and algae establish, they contribute to sediment accumulation, eventually allowing for the growth of wetland plants. Over time, this progression can lead to the development of a marsh or swamp, and eventually transition to dry land ecosystems such as grasslands or forests. In contrast, deeper ponds are less likely to undergo significant terrestrial succession.


A very small tilt in Earth'sare axis would likely cause .?

That would most likely cause a very small change in the seasons.


If Pluto were as large as mercury could it be classified as terrestrial?

No, even if Pluto were as large as Mercury, it would not be classified as terrestrial. Terrestrial planets are composed primarily of rock and metal, while Pluto is composed of ice and rock. Additionally, Pluto's orbit and location in the solar system would still make it more like a dwarf planet rather than a terrestrial planet.

Related Questions

In what habitat would a cold-blooded organism be least likely to live?

A terrestrial, arctic habitat.


In what habitat would a cold blooded organism be least likely to live?

A terrestrial, arctic habitat.


What would have most likely occurred if plants had not begun to live on land?

If plants had not evolved to live on land, it is likely that terrestrial ecosystems would have remained dominated by non-plant organisms such as fungi, bacteria, and algae. This would have drastically altered the development of terrestrial ecosystems and likely impacted the evolution of animals that rely on plants for food and habitat.


What inner planet could we most likely live on?

The inner or terrestrial planet that we could most likely live on is Earth. Mars would be a far distant second.


Which change would she most likely observe in the plant after a few days?

She would likely observe an increase in leaf growth or a change in flower color.


How would this change affect the electric circuit?

The change would likely impact the flow of electricity in the circuit.


Which pond would most likely to lead to terrestrial succession?

A pond that is shallow and gradually fills in with sediment and organic material is most likely to lead to terrestrial succession. As aquatic plants and algae establish, they contribute to sediment accumulation, eventually allowing for the growth of wetland plants. Over time, this progression can lead to the development of a marsh or swamp, and eventually transition to dry land ecosystems such as grasslands or forests. In contrast, deeper ponds are less likely to undergo significant terrestrial succession.


A very small tilt in Earth'sare axis would likely cause .?

That would most likely cause a very small change in the seasons.


Would you weigh more on a gaseous planet or terrestrial planet?

Based on the fact that the gaseous planets in the solar system have much greater mass than terrestrial planets, you would weigh more as weight depends on gravitational pull, which is increased based on the mass of the object.


Is Earth a Terrestrial Jovian or Dwarf Planet?

"Terra" is the Latin for land or earth. It would therefore follow that Earth is "terrestrial".


How many miles is it from Dublin to Sunny Beach in Bulgaria?

It is about 1715 miles. It does depend how you travel. Most likely you would fly, but you could do it by sea and over land, which would change the distance to over 2100 miles.It is about 1715 miles. It does depend how you travel. Most likely you would fly, but you could do it by sea and over land, which would change the distance to over 2100 miles.It is about 1715 miles. It does depend how you travel. Most likely you would fly, but you could do it by sea and over land, which would change the distance to over 2100 miles.It is about 1715 miles. It does depend how you travel. Most likely you would fly, but you could do it by sea and over land, which would change the distance to over 2100 miles.It is about 1715 miles. It does depend how you travel. Most likely you would fly, but you could do it by sea and over land, which would change the distance to over 2100 miles.It is about 1715 miles. It does depend how you travel. Most likely you would fly, but you could do it by sea and over land, which would change the distance to over 2100 miles.It is about 1715 miles. It does depend how you travel. Most likely you would fly, but you could do it by sea and over land, which would change the distance to over 2100 miles.It is about 1715 miles. It does depend how you travel. Most likely you would fly, but you could do it by sea and over land, which would change the distance to over 2100 miles.It is about 1715 miles. It does depend how you travel. Most likely you would fly, but you could do it by sea and over land, which would change the distance to over 2100 miles.It is about 1715 miles. It does depend how you travel. Most likely you would fly, but you could do it by sea and over land, which would change the distance to over 2100 miles.It is about 1715 miles. It does depend how you travel. Most likely you would fly, but you could do it by sea and over land, which would change the distance to over 2100 miles.


Is the moon a terrestrial planet?

No. The moon is not a planet; it is a moon. If it had its own orbit around the sun it would be considered a terrestrial planet.