0
What else can I help you with?
Are kidney cells prokaryotic?
No, kidney cells are eukaryotic.All cells in the human body are eukaryotic except one. Red blood cells are, strictly speaking, prokaryotic because they do not have a nucleus but this is a structural adaptation that allows the cells to carry as much oxygen as possible so they are still listed as eukaryotic.
What structures are found in both eukaryotic cells and prokaryotic cells?
Ribosomes, Cytoplasm, and DNA.
What is the main problem with classifying protists?
Historical classificationsThe first division of the protists from other organisms came in the 1830s, when the German biologist Georg August Goldfuss introduced the word protozoa to refer to organisms such as ciliates and corals.[4] This group was expanded in 1845 to include all "unicellular animals", such as Foraminifera and amoebae. The formal taxonomic category Protoctista was first proposed in the early 1860s by John Hogg, who argued that the protists should include what he saw as primitive unicellular forms of both plants and animals. He defined the Protoctista as a "fourth kingdom of nature", in addition to the then-traditional kingdoms of plants, animals and minerals.[4] The kingdom of minerals was later removed from taxonomy by Ernst Haeckel, leaving plants, animals, and the protists as a "kingdom of primitive forms".[5]Herbert Copeland resurrected Hogg's label almost a century later, arguing that "Protoctista" literally meant "first established beings", Copeland complained that Haeckel's term protista included anucleated microbes such as bacteria. Copeland's use of the term protoctista did not. In contrast, Copeland's term included nucleated eukaryotes such as diatoms, green algae and fungi.[6] This classification was the basis for Whittaker's later definition of Fungi, Animalia, Plantae and Protista as the four kingdoms of life.[7] The kingdom Protista was later modified to separate prokaryotes into the separate kingdom of Monera, leaving the protists as a group of eukaryotic microorganisms.[8] These five kingdoms remained the accepted classification until the development of molecular phylogenetics in the late 20th century, when it became apparent that neither protists nor monera were single groups of related organisms (they were not monophyletic groups).[9]Modern classificationsCurrently, the term protist is used to refer to unicellular eukaryotes that either exist as independent cells, or if they occur in colonies, do not show differentiation into tissues.[10] The term protozoa is used to refer to heterotrophic species of protists that do not form filaments. These terms are not used in current taxonomy, and are retained only as convenient ways to refer to these organisms. The taxonomy of protists is still changing. Newer classifications attempt to present monophyletic groups based on ultrastructure, biochemistry, and genetics. Because the protists as a whole are paraphyletic, such systems often split up or abandon the kingdom, instead treating the protist groups as separate lines of eukaryotes. The recent scheme by Adl et al. (2005)[10] is an example that does not bother with formal ranks (phylum, class, etc.) and instead lists organisms in hierarchical lists. This is intended to make the classification more stable in the long term and easier to update. Some of the main groups of protists, which may be treated as phyla, are listed in the taxobox at right.[11] Many are thought to be monophyletic, though there is still uncertainty. For instance, the excavates are probably not monophyletic and the chromalveolates are probably only monophyletic if the haptophytes and cryptomonads are excluded.
How do you find common names for scientific names of protists?
A lot of protists have only been recently discovered or due to their small size are virtually unknown to most people. This causes many of them to lack common names. However, for those that do have common names you can usually find them by doing a google search. Also see the Wikipedia page on protists where many are shown with their common and scientific names.
What on the periodic table metals are listed on the?
On the periodic table metals are listed on the left side.
In these cells listed a prokaryotic cells b protists cells c yeast cells d heterotrophic cells which are more primitive?
Prokaryotic cells are considered more primitive as they lack a true nucleus and membrane-bound organelles, such as mitochondria. Protist cells, yeast cells, and heterotrophic cells are all eukaryotic, meaning they have a true nucleus and membrane-bound organelles.
Are stentor prokaryotic or eukaryotic?
Stentor are eukaryotic organisms. They are single-celled protists belonging to the group ciliates and possess a nucleus enclosed within a membrane, which is a defining characteristic of eukaryotic cells.
Are kidney cells prokaryotic?
No, kidney cells are eukaryotic.All cells in the human body are eukaryotic except one. Red blood cells are, strictly speaking, prokaryotic because they do not have a nucleus but this is a structural adaptation that allows the cells to carry as much oxygen as possible so they are still listed as eukaryotic.
Four of the five answers listed below share the identical genetic code a animals b fungi c mitochondria d nost protists e plants?
animals
Can you correct this sentence for me. Dan bought an antique primitive pine dresser and he hopes that it can be easily refinished?
"Dan bought a primitive, antique pine dresser that he hopes can be easily refinished."OR"Dan bought a primitive, antique pine dresser, and he hopes that it can easily be refinished."The arrangement of the adjectives (antique, primitive, pine) before the noun (dresser) were decided by using the OPSHACOM rule, which denotes the order in which adjectives should be listed.OPinionSHapeAgeColourOriginMaterialIn the case of the given sentence, "primitive" is the speaker's opinion of the dresser and is thus listed first. "Antique" denotes the age and finally "pine" indicates the material of the dresser.
What structures are found in both eukaryotic cells and prokaryotic cells?
Ribosomes, Cytoplasm, and DNA.
What is the main problem with classifying protists?
Historical classificationsThe first division of the protists from other organisms came in the 1830s, when the German biologist Georg August Goldfuss introduced the word protozoa to refer to organisms such as ciliates and corals.[4] This group was expanded in 1845 to include all "unicellular animals", such as Foraminifera and amoebae. The formal taxonomic category Protoctista was first proposed in the early 1860s by John Hogg, who argued that the protists should include what he saw as primitive unicellular forms of both plants and animals. He defined the Protoctista as a "fourth kingdom of nature", in addition to the then-traditional kingdoms of plants, animals and minerals.[4] The kingdom of minerals was later removed from taxonomy by Ernst Haeckel, leaving plants, animals, and the protists as a "kingdom of primitive forms".[5]Herbert Copeland resurrected Hogg's label almost a century later, arguing that "Protoctista" literally meant "first established beings", Copeland complained that Haeckel's term protista included anucleated microbes such as bacteria. Copeland's use of the term protoctista did not. In contrast, Copeland's term included nucleated eukaryotes such as diatoms, green algae and fungi.[6] This classification was the basis for Whittaker's later definition of Fungi, Animalia, Plantae and Protista as the four kingdoms of life.[7] The kingdom Protista was later modified to separate prokaryotes into the separate kingdom of Monera, leaving the protists as a group of eukaryotic microorganisms.[8] These five kingdoms remained the accepted classification until the development of molecular phylogenetics in the late 20th century, when it became apparent that neither protists nor monera were single groups of related organisms (they were not monophyletic groups).[9]Modern classificationsCurrently, the term protist is used to refer to unicellular eukaryotes that either exist as independent cells, or if they occur in colonies, do not show differentiation into tissues.[10] The term protozoa is used to refer to heterotrophic species of protists that do not form filaments. These terms are not used in current taxonomy, and are retained only as convenient ways to refer to these organisms. The taxonomy of protists is still changing. Newer classifications attempt to present monophyletic groups based on ultrastructure, biochemistry, and genetics. Because the protists as a whole are paraphyletic, such systems often split up or abandon the kingdom, instead treating the protist groups as separate lines of eukaryotes. The recent scheme by Adl et al. (2005)[10] is an example that does not bother with formal ranks (phylum, class, etc.) and instead lists organisms in hierarchical lists. This is intended to make the classification more stable in the long term and easier to update. Some of the main groups of protists, which may be treated as phyla, are listed in the taxobox at right.[11] Many are thought to be monophyletic, though there is still uncertainty. For instance, the excavates are probably not monophyletic and the chromalveolates are probably only monophyletic if the haptophytes and cryptomonads are excluded.
How do you find common names for scientific names of protists?
A lot of protists have only been recently discovered or due to their small size are virtually unknown to most people. This causes many of them to lack common names. However, for those that do have common names you can usually find them by doing a google search. Also see the Wikipedia page on protists where many are shown with their common and scientific names.
When was Avaya listed on the NYSE?
Not yet listed.....
When listed the location of a place the degree of latitude is always listed?
It's always listed first!:)
Does somewhat listed make sense?
No. Somewhat is an adverb of degree, and cannot modify "listed" as a verb. If listed is an adjective (e.g. listed numbers), it refers to a status, not a characteristic that could occur in degrees (e.g. size, duration, or emotion).An item or aspect could be "listed occasionally" or "listed questionably" but not listed somewhat.
Is Kangaroo Island heritage listed?
No. Kangaroo Island is not heritage listed.
