Science is the pursuit of knowledge. It is a scientist's main objective to discover and record any advancement they discover, which means recording it clearly and honestly. If a scientist presents information that is inaccurate or ambiguous they may be black-carded, which means they're basically shunned from the scientific community.
A published document written by a scientist or team of scientists to describe a scientific project - i.e. what they were trying to prove, how they set about it, the results of their experiments and what conclusions they drew.
A scientific journal is a periodical publication that presents research findings, scientific discussions, and reviews within a specific academic discipline. It serves as a platform for scientists and researchers to share their work with the scientific community, undergo peer review for quality control, and disseminate new knowledge to a wider audience.
There are various reasons to use scientific journals. One is that it can be the basis of research. The research may have been done to either support or falsify specific hypothesis introduced by scientific journal(s). It can also support or falsify the findings of scientific journal(s). Another reason to use scientific journals is the other way around. Scientific journals can be used to support or falsify research findings. The main point is: scientific journals presents ideas and findings. Because hypothesis are deemed "plausible" until proven false, a research is somehow useless if scientific journals that only support the research findings are included. Findings that contradict the research data must be included. If not, then at least, the audience knows that there was either not enough information to contradict the research or the research findings are partly "true." Moreover, scientific journals tell the audience "on what basis did the researchers conducted their research on." Is there enough credibility? (Background) Information? etc.
Galileo seeks to appease the Church by emphasizing that his scientific findings do not contradict Scripture but rather complement it, suggesting that both faith and reason can coexist. He also adopts a cautious approach in his writings, framing his heliocentric theory as a hypothesis rather than a definitive conclusion, which allows him to avoid direct confrontation with Church doctrine. Additionally, he seeks approval from influential Church figures and presents his findings in a manner that respects the Church's authority.
Science is the pursuit of knowledge. It is a scientist's main objective to discover and record any advancement they discover, which means recording it clearly and honestly. If a scientist presents information that is inaccurate or ambiguous they may be black-carded, which means they're basically shunned from the scientific community.
A published document written by a scientist or team of scientists to describe a scientific project - i.e. what they were trying to prove, how they set about it, the results of their experiments and what conclusions they drew.
A scientific journal is a periodical publication that presents research findings, scientific discussions, and reviews within a specific academic discipline. It serves as a platform for scientists and researchers to share their work with the scientific community, undergo peer review for quality control, and disseminate new knowledge to a wider audience.
An example of public scientific communication is a TED Talk where a scientist presents their research findings on climate change to a general audience. In this format, the scientist simplifies complex concepts and uses engaging visuals to make the information accessible and relatable, fostering public understanding and dialogue about the issue. Additionally, articles in popular science magazines or educational YouTube videos also serve as effective means of public scientific communication.
There are various reasons to use scientific journals. One is that it can be the basis of research. The research may have been done to either support or falsify specific hypothesis introduced by scientific journal(s). It can also support or falsify the findings of scientific journal(s). Another reason to use scientific journals is the other way around. Scientific journals can be used to support or falsify research findings. The main point is: scientific journals presents ideas and findings. Because hypothesis are deemed "plausible" until proven false, a research is somehow useless if scientific journals that only support the research findings are included. Findings that contradict the research data must be included. If not, then at least, the audience knows that there was either not enough information to contradict the research or the research findings are partly "true." Moreover, scientific journals tell the audience "on what basis did the researchers conducted their research on." Is there enough credibility? (Background) Information? etc.
A peer-reviewed scientific article is written by experts in the field, undergoes rigorous evaluation by other experts before publication, includes citations to other research, and presents original research findings.
A scientific theory presents an explanation for a phenomenon. Using that explanation, one can then make predictions about what will happen under certain conditions. But the prediction is not the theory, it is a implication of the theory.
In a scientific paper or report, the conclusion usually comes after the results section. The results section presents the raw data and findings, which are then interpreted in the conclusion section to discuss the implications of the results and how they support the hypothesis or research question.
A white paper is a report or guide that presents information or proposals on a specific topic. In the field of science, white papers are used to communicate research findings, propose new ideas, or provide recommendations on scientific issues. They are often used to inform policymakers, researchers, and the public about important scientific developments or challenges.
A scientific research article is typically considered a primary source because it presents original research findings, methodologies, and data directly from the authors. It reports new results and insights that have not been previously published. In contrast, secondary sources summarize, analyze, or interpret primary research, such as review articles or textbooks.
The manuscript under consideration in Nature Communications is significant because it presents new research findings that contribute to the scientific knowledge in a particular field. This research could potentially advance our understanding of a specific topic and have implications for future studies and applications.
A primary research article presents original research findings conducted by the authors, while a scientific review article summarizes and analyzes existing research on a specific topic. Look for methods, results, and discussion sections in a primary research article, and a comprehensive overview of existing research in a review article.