Logically speaking, 300 is less than 3 and you would need to either subtract or divide to go from bigger to smaller, right? Since there is 100 centimeters (cm) in 1 meter (m), following the pattern there would be 300 centimeters in 3 meters. Another way to figure it out is to do 300 divided by 3 and you would get 100(Or vice versa, 300 divided by 3 and get 100). You can also do reverse and do 100 times 3 and you will get 300. Both ways work.
1 meter = 100 centimeters3 meters is equal to 300 cm.Therefore, 3 meters is larger than 200 centimeters.
35 cm 300 - 265 = 35
To convert centimeters to decameters, you need to divide by 10 twice because there are 10 centimeters in a decimeter and 10 decimeters in a meter. Therefore, 300 cm is equal to 3 decameters (300 cm / 10 cm/dm / 10 dm/m = 3 dam).
There are 100 centimetres in one metre. Therefore 300 centimetres is equal to 300/100 = 3 metres.
it is equal to like 430 cm if converted correctly :)
By unit of length and distance and conversion ,we can say that 1 m=100 cm so,3 m =300 cm so,300 cm is equal to 3m
100 cm = 1 m, so 300/100 ie 3 m
Three (3) meters does not equal 3000 centimeters.
No, 100 cm is not bigger than 3 m. In fact, 3 m is equal to 300 cm, which is significantly larger than 100 cm. Therefore, 3 m is greater than 100 cm.
300 cm = 3 m = 9.843 ft (rounded)
300 cm
To compare the measurements, we need to convert them to the same unit. 3175 mm is equal to 317.5 cm (since 1 m = 100 cm). 325 cm is equal to 3.25 m. 3 m is equal to 300 cm. Thus, the smallest measurement is 317.5 cm (3175 mm).
Since 1 meter = 100 cm, then 3 m = 300 cm.
3.0 m = 3 x 10^2 cm = 300 cm
100 cm = 1 m ⇒ 300 cm = 300 ÷ 100 m = 3 m
Yes, 300 cm is equal to 3 m. This is because 1 meter is equivalent to 100 centimeters, so when you convert 3 meters to centimeters, you multiply by 100, resulting in 300 cm.
100 cm = 1 m So 3 m = 300 cm