No. Earth-like lifeforms could not exist in the environments found there.
However, because there is water ice in craters near the poles, it is possible that a human base or colony might eventually be located there.
10'000 -100'000 years
NO beacuse there are many poisonous gases and very hot core
Extreme temperatures: Mercury experiences temperature variations of over 600 degrees Celsius between its day and night, making it inhospitable for human life. Lack of atmosphere: Mercury has a very thin atmosphere that is unable to retain heat or protect against harmful solar radiation. Lack of water: Mercury does not have any liquid water on its surface, which is essential for supporting life as we know it. High levels of solar radiation: Due to its close proximity to the Sun, Mercury is subjected to high levels of solar radiation, making it unsuitable for supporting life.
Yes, the Canadian Shield is considered a livable region. While it is characterized by its rocky terrain and forested areas, there are communities and cities located within the shield where people live and thrive. The region may have challenges due to its geography, but it is still a habitable area.
chloride:- mercury (I) chloride mercury(II) chloride oxygen:- mercury oxide iodine:-mercury iodide flourine:- mercury(II) fluoridemercury(IV) fluoride bromide:- mercury bromidesulphur:- mercury sulphate mercury sulphidenitrogen and carbon :- mercury cyanide
Livable Netherlands ended in 2006.
Livable Streets was created in 1981.
Livable Rotterdam was created in 2001.
Mars is not "livable". There are no planets in the solar system that are livable without artificial environments.
Livable Netherlands was created on 1999-03-25.
That is the correct spelling of "livable" (suitable for living, worth living, habitable).
no
All of Antarctica would be considered non-livable, at least for animal life.
Unlivable livable Accountable irreplaceable Stable
Uninhabitable
Not to Earth life.
The cast of Most Livable City - 2010 includes: Fiona Rayher