0
What else can I help you with?
Are both DNA and rna are involved in the central dogma of biology?
Yes, both DNA and RNA are involved in the central dogma of biology. DNA carries the genetic information from which RNA is transcribed. RNA, in turn, is used to synthesize proteins based on the instructions encoded in DNA.
What could be your personal experience that van relate to central dogma?
My personal experience with the central dogma of molecular biology can be likened to the process of learning and applying new skills. Just as DNA serves as the blueprint for RNA, which is then translated into proteins that perform functions in the cell, I often start with foundational knowledge (analogous to DNA) that I then transform into practical skills (like RNA) to achieve specific tasks or projects (similar to proteins). This process illustrates how information is transmitted and utilized in both biology and personal growth.
What is the importance of central dogma?
The central dogma of molecular biology was first enunciated by Francis Crick in 1958[1] and re-stated in a Nature paper published in 1970:[2] : The central dogma of molecular biology deals with the detailed residue-by-residue transfer of sequential information. It states that information cannot be transferred back from protein to either protein or nucleic acid. In other words, 'once information gets into protein, it can't flow back to nucleic acid.' The dogma is a framework for understanding the transfer of sequence information between sequential information-carrying biopolymers, in the most common or general case, in living organisms. There are 3 major classes of such biopolymers: DNA and RNA (both nucleic acids), and protein. There are 3×3 = 9 conceivable direct transfers of information that can occur between these. The dogma classes these into 3 groups of 3: 3 general transfers (believed to occur normally in most cells), 3 special transfers (known to occur, but only under specific conditions in case of some viruses or in a laboratory), and 3 unknown transfers (believed to never occur). The general transfers describe the normal flow of biological information: DNA can be copied to DNA (DNA replication), DNA information can be copied into mRNA, (transcription), and proteins can be synthesized using the information in mRNA as a template
What are the similarities between autotrophs and hetrotrophs?
the similarities are they both are in biology
How are biology and technology related?
they are both used for the same thing
Are both DNA and rna are involved in the central dogma of biology?
Yes, both DNA and RNA are involved in the central dogma of biology. DNA carries the genetic information from which RNA is transcribed. RNA, in turn, is used to synthesize proteins based on the instructions encoded in DNA.
How are transcription and translation related to the central dogma of molecular biology?
Transcription is the process of copying DNA into RNA, while translation is the process of decoding RNA to produce proteins. Both processes are essential components of the central dogma of molecular biology, which describes the flow of genetic information from DNA to RNA to proteins. In this framework, DNA encodes the information for RNA, which in turn carries the instructions for protein synthesis.
What is the importance of central dogma?
The central dogma of molecular biology was first enunciated by Francis Crick in 1958[1] and re-stated in a Nature paper published in 1970:[2] : The central dogma of molecular biology deals with the detailed residue-by-residue transfer of sequential information. It states that information cannot be transferred back from protein to either protein or nucleic acid. In other words, 'once information gets into protein, it can't flow back to nucleic acid.' The dogma is a framework for understanding the transfer of sequence information between sequential information-carrying biopolymers, in the most common or general case, in living organisms. There are 3 major classes of such biopolymers: DNA and RNA (both nucleic acids), and protein. There are 3×3 = 9 conceivable direct transfers of information that can occur between these. The dogma classes these into 3 groups of 3: 3 general transfers (believed to occur normally in most cells), 3 special transfers (known to occur, but only under specific conditions in case of some viruses or in a laboratory), and 3 unknown transfers (believed to never occur). The general transfers describe the normal flow of biological information: DNA can be copied to DNA (DNA replication), DNA information can be copied into mRNA, (transcription), and proteins can be synthesized using the information in mRNA as a template
Whiy is chemistry involved in biology?
"Why" makes no sense. Both physics and chemistry are everwhere around you, they are involved in just about every action on earth - they are inescapable.
What is the central dogma and who challenged it?
The term "central dogma" of molecular biology is often taken to mean the flow of information from the DNA in the nucleus of the cell, into messenger RNA via transcription, and thence into proteins (more correctly, polypeptide chains) via translation at ribosomes in the cytoplasm.1. The DNA replicates its information in a process that involves many enzymes: replication.2. The DNA codes for the production of messenger RNA (mRNA) during transcription.3. In eukaryotic cells, the mRNA is processed(essentially by splicing) and migrates from the nucleus to the cytoplasm.4. Messenger RNA carries coded information to ribosomes. The ribosomes "read" this information and use it for protein synthesis. This process is called translation.* * *If this question is taken to refer to the above sense of "central dogma", and the "challenge" therefore to the "reverse" flow of information: from RNA to DNA, that was found to be routine in retroviruses (such as HIV, which causes AIDS), using the enzyme reverse transcriptase. The names of David Baltimoreand Howard Temin are particularly associated with the discovery of this enzyme.In fact, this question opens a can of worms! It's all to do with what people take the term "central dogma" to mean.In 1958 Francis Crick coined two terms for two ideas that were then considered fruitful in guiding future research. This was five years after the publication of Watson and Crick's double-helix model for DNA, and three years before the genetic code began to reveal itself through experiments by Nirenberg and Matthaei ("polyU" coding for phenylalanine, etc.) and by Crick and Brenner (the code consisting of three nucleotides).The two ideas were:1The sequence of residues in DNA informs the biosynthesis of proteins (we would now say polypeptides), specifically the sequence of residues (amino acids). Logically enough, Crick called this idea the sequence hypothesis.2Once information (about the sequence of residues) has passed into a protein, it does not come out; in other words, the amino acid sequence of a polypeptide chain does not influence the synthesis of DNA, RNA, or other polypeptide chains. Crick called this the central dogma.In later years, among other things:Watson published a book, Molecular biology of the gene, in which he confused Crick's two points, using the term "central dogma" in a way that relates it to the sequence hypothesis. Watson did not use the term "sequence hypothesis". There has now developed a widespread myth, especially associated with the United States, that the idea of the sequence hypothesis was calledby Crick the "central dogma".Some people who had not read Crick's paper, and knew little of his mind and modus operandi as a scientist, accused him of trying to stifle research, by being "dogmatic" that information could flow only from DNA to RNA to protein, and never in the reverse direction. Crick never said that, as a read of his 1958 paper confirms.Crick wrote a note, published in Nature in 1970, trying to put the record straight. He particularly mentioned by name Barry Commoner as someone who had misquoted him (and, implicitly, someone who had used the misquotation to draw false conclusions about Crick's reasoning and motives).Crick much later admitted that when he chose the word "dogma" he thought it was more or less close in meaning to "hypothesis".Does Crick's central dogma hold true? NO. 1.) A viruses genome consists of RNA. 2.) The process of DNA to RNA to protein can actually be reversed (aka complementary DNA).Prions do not challenge Crick's dogma. The modifications to proteins that prions effect are to secondary structure (coiling and so on), not to the primary structure (the amino acid sequence).***Crick's "Central Dogma" has been contradicted by countless experimental facts. However, "facts don't kill theories - only more advanced theories kill obsolete theories". "The Principle of Recursive Genome Function" (Pellionisz, 2008) showed that by retiring the old mistaken axioms of BOTH JunkDNA and Central Dogma we accomplish the theoretical breakthrough towards "Recursive Genome Function".
How can a mutually beneficial relationship in biology be defined and what are the key factors that contribute to its success?
A mutually beneficial relationship in biology occurs when two different species interact in a way that benefits both parties. Key factors that contribute to the success of such a relationship include coevolution, symbiosis, and the exchange of resources or services that enhance the survival and reproduction of both species involved.
What fields of science aside from the branches of chemistry rely on the study of chemistry?
Not just Biology and medicine, but all other sciences. Chemistry has been described as the "Central" science. Check out this link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_central_science It interlopes with both Biology and Physics. It really depends what you want to eventually do
Is human biology and cell biology the same?
Human Biology refers to quite literally the biology of the human body. Cell Biology can consist of both the life processes of animals (humans) and plants or bacteria, at the cellular level.
Is the study of muscle movements an example of biology or physics?
It is an example of both, as biology and physics overlap because the boundary of science between them is not always so clear.
How does home economic related to biology?
they are both subjects
Can genetics be chemistry and biology?
Yes, genetics can be considered a combination of both chemistry and biology. Genetics relies on understanding the chemical structure of DNA and how it interacts with biological systems to determine inheritance patterns and gene expression. Chemistry explains the molecular basis of genetic traits, while biology encompasses how these traits are passed down and impact living organisms.
Why does biology and anatomy never coincide?
Biology and anatomy often coincide because the two subjects both have to do with the body.
