Is global warming logical why or why not?

Answer 1

The world temperature average is increasing, and no scientist can dispute that fact.

Is it caused by man? This is hard to prove definitively, but the charts from the beginning of fossil fuel use and temperature mirror each other almost exactly.

And then there's the ice record. Ice cores hold gases. You can actually see the eruptions of Krakatoa and Vesuvius in the ice record. And after looking for and finding the "Extinction of the Dinosaurs" event, they looked for and found another extinction event that allowed the dinosaurs to exist. And once again, CO2 levels mirror the burning of fossil fuels.

Logic is in the eye of the beholder, but many people are convinced that it's not worth the risk, just to make or save money. What sense would it make to give everyone a private jet if their was no place left to land it. At this point, we're past the point of asking if it's logical. The world is going to head in that direction, regardless. We need to start asking; how we make the transformation efficient, and how we minimize the adverse effects that every transition carries with it.

Answer 2

Yes, global warming is considered logical based on scientific evidence that shows an increase in greenhouse gas emissions from human activities leading to a rise in global temperatures. This phenomenon has been consistently observed and studied, and the overwhelming consensus among climate scientists is that human activities are driving global warming.