Whether "implode" is worse than "explode" depends on the context. An explosion typically involves a violent outward release of energy, often resulting in destruction and chaos. In contrast, implosion usually refers to a collapse inward, which can be less destructive in terms of surrounding damage but still poses significant risks. Ultimately, the severity of each event depends on the specific circumstances and consequences involved.
Plasmas can both implode and explode, depending on the conditions and forces acting on them. In astrophysical contexts, such as in stars, plasmas can implode under gravitational forces, leading to phenomena like supernovae. Conversely, in laboratory settings or during certain explosive events, plasmas may explode due to rapid thermal expansion or magnetic field instabilities. The specific behavior of a plasma is determined by its temperature, density, and external influences.
Probably neither. Cars are not air tight. Any air trapped in the car to begin with would leak out through the vents and around the doors and windows.
No, the singularity itself does not cause stars to explode. Stars can explode in a powerful event called a supernova when they run out of nuclear fuel and can no longer support their own gravity. The singularity is a point of infinite density at the center of a black hole where the laws of physics as we know them break down.
It won't
Generally, no. The cold may cause the liquid contents to solidify, but they don't take up that much room in the container. That means they won't freeze and expand and break the container by doing so, even if they expand when they freeze. Freezing the propellant doesn't do anything to it except reduce its vapor pressure. Addendum... the first answer is right on. I add only that this myth comes from what happens when you freeze water, where it flashes from a dense liquid to a less dense crystal lattice. That "formalized" shape takes up more room than the liquid form which is why ice cubes float in water. This lattice formation is actually quite rare, and doesn't usually apply to non-water gases or liquids. Actually, both above are generally wrong. It is predicted that no, an aerosol can will not explode. It will IMPLODE. Yes, it does matter how cold it is. If it was -10, then no. But if it is drastic, say -150 degrees or so, it will implode because if the liquid in the can is under pressure already, it would have to be HEATED to explode! Duh! So it is possible that it will implode. Never explode in cold temperature.
The opposite of implode is explode.
The antonym of 'implode' is 'explode'.
Explode
implode.
CodedGoadedLoadedExplodedCorroded
Implode means to collapse inwardly, but explode means blow up, or outwards. Exactly
explode, load. see rhymes.com
To explode is to burst outward with force. The antonym of explode is the word implode, which means to burst inward
implode
As you move upward the external pressure decreases. Thus all would try to "explode" ... but your examples would probably not (they would resist the pressure drop).
It will implode, because there is no air pressure inside of the tube, yet there is 14.7 PSI of air on the outside.
In a controlled demolition it implodes. If a terrorist blows it up it explodes.