not now. also they would cause causal violations.
No tachyon has ever been discovered, thus there is no real symbol 'reserved' for it (like a greek nu is usually used to denote a neutrino). Physicists may attempt to develop models containing tachyons but they usually choose their own symbol for their own particular tachyon.
A tachyon is a hypothetical subatomic particle that moves faster than light. In the language of special relativity, a tachyon would be a particle with space-like four-momentum and imaginary proper time. A tachyon would be constrained to the space-like portion of the energy-momentum graph. Therefore, it cannot slow down to subluminal (slower than light) speeds.Despite the theoretical arguments against the existence of tachyon particles, experimental searches have been conducted to test the assumption against their existence; however, no experimental evidence for the existence of tachyon particles has been found. Recently, time of flight measurements from the CERN-OPERA collaboration have indicated that muon neutrinos may exceed the speed of light, but OPERA scientists have refrained from drawing conclusions, requesting that other groups first verify their result.
Nobody knows, they have never been detected. For now tachyonic matter is purely a theoretical construct.
Rigorously controlled experiments can provide evidence to support or refute a hypothesis, but they cannot definitively prove a hypothesis. Scientific hypotheses are continually evaluated, refined, and occasionally rejected based on new evidence and further experimentation.
1,2-dichloropropane exists as an optical isomer.
A tachyon (from the Greek word for "speed") is a hypothetical sub-atomic particle which always travels faster than light. Even it if actually exists, our current physics theories tell us that we will NEVER be able to detect it.
Tachyon Publications was created in 1995.
The bottom line is "No."It likewise does not prove that God does notexist.
You go to Alberta and find Steve, and Steve will help you prove it exists... Hes super cool
light a match
People have so many definitions of God so it is hard to prove that God exists. A religious experience may make a believer of you but it may not "prove" God exists as your experience may not convince a non-believer.
It is not possible to prove God doesn't exist, just as we can't prove fairies, elves and unicorns don't exist. The inability to prove something doesn't exist does not therefore mean that it does exist. It is not possible to prove that there is no teapot in orbit around Pluto, yet the lack of such a proof doesn't mean that the teapot therefore exists. There have been several attempts to prove that God exists using logic (eg Kalam cosmological argument, Transcendental Argument for God [TAG]), but these are not universally accepted as valid and true - if they were then there'd be no need for any further discussion.
No. Tachyon condensation is a term used in physics. Please refer to the attached article.
yes
Prove that god exists
Aliens.
A tachyon